Thứ Bảy, 9 tháng 3, 2013

Taking Response-Ability: How to Have a Heathy Response to Your New York DWI



Lawyers? An Overreaction, you decide? from quickmeme.com


People accept (or reject) bad news in a multitude of ways, some just avoid it completely, as in denial, some get angry at themselves, and some get angry at others. Recently, a man in Plattsburgh, NY set himself on fire 2 hours after his DWI arrest. Now the man was 60 years of age, and I don't know the back story but overreaction to DWIs is not as unusual as you might imagine.

The Reaction versus The Response

I have seen the gamut of overreactions to first, second, and third DWI arrests ranging from drinking binges to suicide. I have seen people get new DWIs following pending DWI charges.

First, why? because once people think they messed up it just drives them into an even greater (deeper) depression. Hurting yourself becomes the norm. They feel at some level they need to be punished and self punishment is maybe more controlled and predictable.

I believe that Any "reaction" is bad AND it is far better to "respond" to YOUR problems. It may sound purely semantic, as in word games but taking response-ability is ultimately healthier.

Larry Newman, Junior psychologist?

Now before you label me amateur junior psychologist let me state for the record, I am not a psychologist, nor trying to diagnose mental disease of my clients but I do care about people. I want them to maintain a healthy perspective as to what they are facing with any DWI charge. Waste of life and human potential is so horrible to watch. Getting a DWI is not the end of your life. Yes it is a problem, a looming challenge, and there may be issues (some underlying) that will need to be addressed but overreaction helps noone.
Least of all, YOU!

Self Infliction of Pain, not pretty. from ibtimes.com

Playing it Over and Over: The Broken Record of Pain

Some people get caught in the stages/cycles of grief (anger, denial, acceptance, bargaining, depression). They may cycle over and through these as with any "loss" or "perceived loss." I call it the broken record of pain. This is neither healthy nor productive. You are standing in place self flagellating (as in, stop hitting yourself).

So here is my take as a DWI Defense lawyer, four things you should keep in mind to best deal with your DWI charges:

1. There is no black and white DWI charge.

All DWIs come in shades of grey, discuss with your attorney where yours lies on the spectrum of cases and situations. Compare your situation to others to have a healthy context. Usually a DWI without people or property damage is better than one with it.

2. What is your true exposure? 

What is the worst case scenario? What is the best case scenario?
Is it jail? Is it probation? Is it community service? Is it financial? Is it your job? Is it your license? I other words what are you facing from the Court, the DMV, and your family/friends. Can you, will you face the worst and still surmount it?

3. What can "you" be doing to help your situation? 

Being proactive early can alleviate a lot of uncertainty. Taking ownership of your issues with your attorney is healthier than just giving your problem away to someone. I like the participant approach, you are better knowing about everything than being a mushroom in the dark. Whether the issues are health and/or legal related being a spectator dooms you to repetition.

4. Ask lots of questions. 

This approach to seeking answers aligns completely with the participant model. You may find that the Court will give you time to pay any fines or surcharges, you may find that the license loss is for a much shorter time period than you imagined, and you may find that jail/prison is not likely. After the attorney has all the facts, discovery, and documents they may find that there are viable defenses to your charges.

In the end, to "err is human and to forgive divine." 

I personally have learned and grown more from my "mistakes" than from all my "successes." Problems are deeply transformative if you allow them to be. I believe that your DWI can be another lesson and ultimately a blessing if you have a better perspective.

Larry Newman
Doctor of Chiropractic
Attorney and Counselor at Law

http://www.ithacadwi.com

newman.lawrence@gmail.com

Thứ Tư, 6 tháng 3, 2013

Ithaca Lawyer Understanding YOUR DWI Sixth Amendment Rights are Meaty


Your New York Fair Trial Rights, A Meaty Amendment
from servicesannenbergclasroom.org


People love throwing around the Bill of Rights, and the amendments to the Constitution piecemeal. As if each amendment equals one right you have.

In truth the Sixth Amendment is a "meaty" amendment. It has a lot going on and gives you your "Fair Trial Rights." It may be one amendment but it is packed with entitlements and protections.

First some clarification, The First Ten Amendments = Your Bill of Rights.
The Sixth Amendment is specifically related to your Rights Involving Criminal Process against YOU.
These are the protections afforded us against the government. They were fought for long and hard by our forefathers (and mothers).

DWI cases are defended and fought based upon the 4th, 5th, and 6th Amendments.
The Sixth Amendment has these 7 parts:

1. Right to a Speedy Trial
There is a time table. They can't take forever to prosecute you.

2. Right to a Public Trial
You have a right to have everyone know how you have been treated (fairly or unfairly). No secrets, total transparency.

3. Right to an Impartial Jury
You are entitled to pick a jury. Sometimes this is more like a de-select a jury.

4. Right to Confront Witnesses (this is also called the "Confrontation Clause")
You have a right to question those accusing you of criminal behavior. To bring to light their biases, their prejudices, and to challenge their opinions. In a DWI case these are usually police witnesses.

5. Right to Compel the Court to Subpoena Witnesses
You have the right to make people come to Court.

6. Right to an Attorney (counsel)
You have a right to be assisted by an attorney at every step/stage in the process.

7. Right to Information and Notice of what the charges are and what proof they plan to use
You have a right to know what you are charged with, how they plan on proving these charges against you, and what specific statements they plan on using against you

Every person accused of a DWI has these Basic Constitutional Rights. Their attorney is there to assist them, assure them, and use them to protect their interests at every stage of the process. None of this should be taken lightly.

Larry Newman, D.C., J.D.

http://www.ithacadwi.com

607-229-5184



Thứ Ba, 5 tháng 3, 2013

Top 20 Sources of U.S. Archaeological, Historical, and Ethnological Imports

European nations accounted for ten of the top 20 sources of archaeological, historical, and ethnological material imported into the United States in 2012. Switzerland led the list overall, with the United Kingdom coming in second. That is according to data compiled from tariff and trade information supplied by the U.S. Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission.

In broad terms, the U.S. last year imported  $173,237,300 (customs valuation) worth of objects for consumption that were declared to be "collections and collectors' pieces of zoological, botanical, mineralogical, anatomical, historical, archeological, paleontological, ethnographic or numismatic interest" under Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS) 9705. HTS 9705 excludes "antiques" over 100 years old (e.g., silverware and furniture), classified elsewhere by HTS 9706.

Photo credit: Athewma
Among the total customs value of HTS 9705 goods imported into the U.S., objects specifically classified as archaeological, historical, or ethnological under HTS 9705.00.0070 accounted for $37,378,500. Imports received from Switzerland and the U.K. made up nearly 50% of this total, while Egypt and Italy together accounted for 25%.

(It is worth noting that non-gold numismatic collectors' coin imports, classified by HTS 9705.00.0060, amounted to $52,897,300, and that gold numismatic collectors' coins, classified by HTS 9705.00.0030, totaled $34,360,000. These tariff categories are ones typically expected to cover ancient coins.  See e.g., Customs Ruling N233501.)

The top 20 source countries for archaeological, historical, or ethnographic objects imported for consumption into the U.S. in 2012--as a percentage of the total customs value of all such imports--were:

1. Switzerland
     23.30%

2. United Kingdom
     19.92%

3. Egypt
     13.87%

4. Italy
     11.21%

5. Spain
     9.35%

6. Germany
     4.89%

7. France
     4.53%

8. Greece
     2.48%

9. Israel
     1.60%

10. Congo (ROC)
     1.39%

11. Turkey
     1.07%

12. Korea
     .54%

13. Canada
     .72%

14. Mali
     .68%

15. Morocco
     .49%

16. Ukraine
     .46%

17. New Zealand
     .45%

18. Austria
     .32%

19. Australia
     .27%

20. Sweden
     .22%

This list may prompt important cultural property discussions, including conversations about the definition of a "source nation" and whether traditional source countries such as Egypt and Italy should be characterized as "retentionist." The data certainly need to be studied in greater detail to gain more insight and understanding.


This post is researched, written, and published on the blog Cultural Heritage Lawyer Rick St. Hilaire at culturalheritagelawyer.blogspot.com. Text copyrighted 2012 by Ricardo A. St. Hilaire, Attorney & Counselor at Law, PLLC. Any unauthorized reproduction or retransmission of this post is prohibited. CONTACT: www.culturalheritagelawyer.com

Thứ Hai, 4 tháng 3, 2013

Belize Final Rule Published

It was reported last week that the United States and Belize entered into a bilateral agreement to establish import protections covering jeopardized archeological heritage.  The final rule has now been published.  It details the types of objects covered under the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU).

The final rule, adopted pursuant to the Cultural Property Implementation Act (CPIA), imposes import restrictions on cultural objects crossing into the United States from Belize.  The items protected include archaeological objects over 250 years old and dating from the Pre-Ceramic (from approximately 9000 B.C.), Pre-Classic, Classic, and Post-Classic Periods of the Pre-Columbian era through the Early and Late Colonial Periods. 

This post is researched, written, and published on the blog Cultural Heritage Lawyer Rick St. Hilaire at culturalheritagelawyer.blogspot.com. Text copyrighted 2012 by Ricardo A. St. Hilaire, Attorney & Counselor at Law, PLLC. Any unauthorized reproduction or retransmission of this post is prohibited. CONTACT: www.culturalheritagelawyer.com

Thứ Bảy, 2 tháng 3, 2013

Judge Nelson Roman, Deputy Mayor Carol Robles-Roman, Is Approved For Seat in Southern District Court

Senate Committee Approves Roman for Southern District

New York Law Journal
March 4, 2013





LINK

Cover Story: Hispanic Power Couples

By Chana Garcia
LINK

Deputy Mayor of NYC Carol Robles-Roman and husband, Judge Nelson Roman


Combining two successful legal careers with a successful marriage is no easy feat. The following Hispanic power couples, Carol and Nelson Roman, Georgina and Frank Angones, and Holly and Marlon Paz, prove that it is indeed possible—and more often than not, prosperous for the entire community.
Long before Sonia Sotomayor became the first Latina to serve on the nation’s high court, she was well-known and well-respected by a network of influential Hispanic attorneys. Back in the late ’90s, one such group, the Puerto Rican Bar Association (PRBA), decided to launch a grassroots campaign to get a Latino justice on the Supreme Court, and Sotomayor was on the organization’s short list.
To rally support for their cause, PRBA officers headed to the nation’s capital, where they literally knocked on lawmakers’ doors. Among them was then-president Nelson S. Roman, now an associate justice on the New York State Supreme Court, Appellate Division.
For Judge Roman, who is of Puerto Rican descent, advocating for other talented Latino attorneys was a no-brainer. The highest court in the land needed a diversified bench, he believed, and he was determined to help all the qualified candidates he knew get on the radar of empathetic legislators.
“We talked to a lot of congressmen and -women,” Judge Roman recalled. “Many were receptive…We told them, ‘These are candidates that you should look at.’ We were promoting the idea of diversity and excellence. We hear the term ‘merit selection.’ And we had candidates who had the scholarship, the academic credentials, and the merit for serious consideration.”
A little more than a decade after Judge Roman’s prescient trip to Washington, his vision—and the vision of the PRBA—came to fruition. Sotomayor made history last summer when she was appointed to the Supreme Court. And, fittingly enough, sitting among the crowd at her confirmation hearings was Carol Robles-Roman, Judge Roman’s wife of 19 years.
Carol, New York City’s deputy mayor for legal affairs and counsel to Mayor Michael Bloomberg, was, like her husband, a longtime supporter of Sotomayor. By chance or by fate, she found herself working alongside Bloomberg as he prepared his congressional testimony on Sotomayor’s behalf.
It was as if everything had come full circle. Judge Roman had lobbied so hard for the day when a Latino would don the robes of a justice, and his wife got to witness it in action.
“I felt like this is the message Judge Roman and I had been sending our whole lives,” noted Carol. “We have excellent Hispanic judges and attorneys, and it feels like it’s been our job to shine a light on that.”
It’s a job the couple has been doing since the start of their careers. Judge Roman, a former New York City police officer, has remained committed to a lifetime of public service since retiring from the force in 1982. He put himself through law school and then joined the King’s County District Attorney’s office, where he served as an assistant D.A. for five years. He started his judicial career in 1997, when he was appointed to the New York City Housing Court. He was later elected to the civil court and then to the State Supreme Court bench. Last year, New York Gov. David Paterson appointed him as an associate justice. Looking back, his career pursuits ideally prepared him for his current role as an appellate jurist.
Carol’s professional career includes executive positions in law, business, and management. She served as a court administrator and an assistant attorney general for the New York State Department of Law Division of Civil Rights. She later became senior vice president of the Puerto Rico Industrial Development Company, where she promoted the relocation of Fortune 500 Companies to the island. New York’s deputy mayor since 2002, she advises the mayor on legal policy and spearheads numerous public-private initiatives, such as Family Justice Centers, or as Carol calls them “state-of-the-art one-stop centers for domestic violence victims.” She also oversees New York’s “Let’s End Human Trafficking” campaign, which is designed to raise awareness about human trafficking in New York and elsewhere.
At a time when Hispanics are becoming the fastest growing minority group in the nation, the Romans represent a new kind of power couple. They’ve developed considerable influence as a result of their individual and collective successes in the legal field. Yet despite their achievements, or perhaps because of them, they’ve made it a point to create opportunities for others.
More than 1,000 miles away in Miami, the same is true for Francisco and Georgina Angones. Back in the ’60s, Frank and Georgina (better known as Georgie) came to this country from Cuba following the 1959 revolution. Georgie fled with her family, while Frank arrived on U.S. shores as a part of Operación Pedro Pan, or Operation Peter Pan, a program that supervised unaccompanied child sent to The States to seek a better life. As is the case with many of their peers, Frank and Georgie were the first in their families to go to college. Their parents and grandparents stressed the importance of higher education, and they both took heed. Frank, now a partner at Angones, McClure & Garcia and past president of the Florida Bar, and Georgie, assistant dean for alumni relations and development at the University of Miami School of Law, studied hard and worked even harder, intelligently navigating their careers and propelling themselves into America’s upper-middle class.
Like the Romans, the Angoneses are dedicated to nurturing the next generation of Hispanic attorneys. They consider the time they spend helping young law school students secure financial aid or land interviews at reputable firms in South Florida as more than just a way of giving back. In many ways, their work is a natural extension of who they are and the principles that make up the very core of their relationship.
“I entered the academic world to put a husband through law school,” notes Georgie. “Frank got accepted to a university in Chicago, but he had to turn down a full scholarship because we both couldn’t manage to go to school and work at the same time.” To ensure that they each had a chance to pursue their legal dreams, these high school sweethearts enrolled at the University of Miami, where Georgie landed a job. With her tuition remission, and her decision to take the maximum number of credits possible each semester, Georgie freed up time for Frank to hit the books—all the while ensuring that they both graduated with minimal debt.
“My wife is a problem-solver,” Frank says. “What first caught my attention to her was that she was a natural leader. She was the person who organized everything. She has always had the ability to take the bull by the horns and get things done. I’m not like that. I worked at becoming a leader and coming out of my shell. I was incredibly shy growing up. But Georgie was not, and I admire that.”
The couple, who count former teachers, employers, and mentors among those who’ve contributed to their professional successes, fondly remember the sacrifices of those who came before them, and that keeps them motivated to reach out to those following in their footsteps.
“If I can touch just one or two people a year, then I’ve done something absolutely fabulous,” says Georgie, who is a member of the Judicial Nominating Committee for the Southern District of Florida. “It’s our responsibility to point out resources and to encourage young Hispanic students to remember that education is the way up for every minority group. The next generation wants to be part of the melting pot, but it’s also important to retain your culture, no matter if it’s Cuban, Portuguese, or Puerto Rican. It’s important to speak the native tongue of your parents because that will open doors for you. Kids who are bilingual are extremely marketable. In Florida, young attorneys who are interested in doing public interest work can get a job at the public defender’s office, or they can work for a nonprofit. There’s also a lot of immigration work. It’s not as lucrative as going to a big firm, but it can be rewarding work for recent grads.”
Recruiting notable talent has also been a driving factor for Marlon and Holly Paz. And for this Washington, D.C.- based couple that has included identifying opportunities for the hardest-working attorneys they know—each other.
After meeting at University of Pennsylvania Law School, the couple married, started a family, and set out on what, at times, has seemed like parallel career paths. Marlon, who is originally from Honduras, and Holly, who grew up in Illinois and Pennsylvania, both landed positions as tax lawyers soon after graduating. Marlon got his start at a firm and then made the leap over to the corporation litigation world, but working at the Securities and Exchange Commission had always been his dream job. Holly eventually made her way to the IRS, where she now works as a managing attorney. With her government position, she often came across federal job postings, but one in particular, with the SEC, caught her eye.
It was an “obscure posting,” Marlon recalls, but Holly nevertheless encouraged him to apply. Marlon got the job and eventually rose through the ranks to become senior counsel to the director, where he worked for six years before becoming the principal integrity officer for the Inter-American Development Bank in July.
“All lawyers are naturally competitive people,” Holly notes. “But the one thing I appreciate about our marriage is that we’re not competitive with each other. We celebrate each other’s accomplishments.”
“And it’s usually Holly helping me,” Marlon interjects. “Law is a tough business, whether you’re in private practice or work for the government. It helps to have an ally and someone to share ideas with.”
The Pazes have since done a lot of recruiting for the federal agencies where they’ve been employed. With firsthand knowledge of the confusing and often difficult application processes, they’ve participated in discussions sponsored by the Hispanic bar associations, the African American counsels, and universities in D.C. to talk to young attorneys interested in tax law and government work about how to get their foot in the door.
“I sent in my materials at least 10 times to several agencies and never heard anything,” adds Marlon, the past president of the Hispanic Bar Association of D.C. and an adjunct professor at Georgetown University. “I felt like it went into a black hole. But Holly kept the hope alive. She helped me get an interview, and that led to a job where I spent years doing something I loved. But there are a lot of people like me out there who are unaware of the steps you need to take. It’s not rocket science; there’s just no guidance. We’re trying to help explain the process.”
Although Latinos remain largely underrepresented in the legal field, their future in the profession seems bright if the growing number of Hispanic power couples is any indication. From city to city, Latino attorneys understand the benefits of building a strong network for themselves and for a country that is becoming increasingly diverse.
“My hope is that there are more and more Latinos interested in the field—a flood of people waiting in the wings,” Marlon says. “But it should never be couched as a feel-good thing. It’s a business case. We ought to promote inclusion because it makes an organization, a law firm, or a government agency stronger.” DB

Chana Garcia is a freelance writer, editor, and blogger based in New York City.

From the September/October 2010 issue of  Diversity & The Bar®


Associate Justice Nelson S. Roman
JUDICIAL EXPERIENCE
NEW YORK STATE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION , FIRST DEPT.
Associate Justice, October 2009 - Present
NEW YORK STATE SUPREME COURT, Civil Term -Bronx County
Justice of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, January 1, 2003 - October 2009
NEW YORK CITY CIVIL COURT, Bronx County
Judge of the New York City Civil Court, January 1, 2001 - December 31, 2002
NEW YORK CITY CIVIL COURT, Bronx Housing Court
Judge of the Housing Part, June 1998 - December 2000 
EDUCATION
BROOKLYN LAW SCHOOL, Brooklyn, New York
J.D. May 1989
FORDHAM UNIVERSITY, Bronx, NY
B.A. 1984 Graduated cum laude
OTHER LEGAL EXPERIENCE
NEW YORK STATE UNIFIED COURT SYSTEM, New York County Civil Court
Law Clerk to Honorable Jose A. Padilla, Jr., January 1995 - June 1998
OFFICE OF THE KINGS COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY, Brooklyn, NY
Felony Trial Assistant District Attorney, April 1994 - January 1995
OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL NARCOTICS PROSECUTOR, New York, NY 
Special Narcotics Assistant District Attorney, January 1992 - March 1994
OFFICE OF THE KINGS COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY, Brooklyn, NY
Assistant District Attorney, August 1989 - December 1991

Ithaca Lawyer Defending the NY DWI with The Police Alphabet Test


Alphabet test, OMG, from joyreactor.com

Sometimes I muse it might be fun being a cop. Why you ask? 

1. They get to command, direct, and instruct people as part of their investigative power. 
2. They get to make shit up. They can lie, and they can use their imaginations to get to the truth.



When it comes to DWI investigations they get to make up their own tests. These are called the 
NON-standardized field sobriety tests because they have NO standards. There is no procedure, instruction, scoring, or method by which we can all agree that someone passes or fails. It is all up to the individual police officer or trooper to decide. How fun is that?

One such test they love to give is the Alphabet test. I have even seen officers give this to foreigners (people whose 2nd language is English). They usually begin by asking people what grade they completed and if they understand English. 

Ithaca Police or IPD, from centralny.wnn.com
1. Alphabet must be said not sing songed. 
The police do not want to hear you say the alphabet as you learned it as a child. This is too easy.

2. They will pick a specific letter to start and end with. This is usually not letter "a" to letter "z." Again way too easy. They will usually pick letter "j" to letter "u."

3. They will want you to begin when they instruct you to.

The alphabet is one of those non-standardized tests that I like for a number of reasons.

1. Even drunk (impaired) people can remember their alphabet. It is so ingrained in the brain.
2. You can usually speak the pronounce the letters articulately. The officer can generally understand you because they know what comes next and know the sequence.
3. It can demonstrate your memory, your alertness, and your cognitive abilities. 
4. Your performance can attack police testimony that your speech was slurred or that you were incoherent.

All in all, I prefer the police alphabet test over many of the other "made up" sobriety tests. 

Larry Newman, D.C., Esq.

newman.lawrence@gmail.com
 607-229-5184

Using the NYS Trooper STOP of a Car to Defend a New York DWI


New York State Troopers have great hats and uniforms
from forums.officers.com


The New York State police are great psychologists. Why the badge, the uniform, and the big hat? Because you can argue with a person (a human), you are not going to argue with a Trooper. They have to be masters at the psychology of control and manipulation because their jobs and lives depend upon figuring people out and taking command.

They must quickly assess, control, and take charge of situations. Sometimes these situations may involve people strung out on drugs and alcohol. Sometimes they are dealing with people who are fighting, arguing, yelling, and/or in the throes of craziness.


Trooper Take Down 101, from flicker.dwightsghost

The most dangerous thing a trooper will ever do is pull over (STOP) a car. Safety is paramount, because they just don't know so many things. They don't know if the person in the car is wanted, is dangerous, is high, is armed, and most importantly is going to try to hurt them. All that uncertainty leads them to approach these car stops with a lot of caution.

Once they notice a violation (equipment/moving) they will turn on their "take down" lights. Perhaps they will also use their siren. Once the car pulls over it is literally bathed in light. This for officer safety.

All the details of the STOP of the car can be used to help defend a DWI case.

A motorist's "Mental and Physical" ability is displayed not just on field sobriety tests but at every moment of their encounter and investigation with a State Trooper.

1. The trooper will first note your ability to respond to his lights in their report.

Did you slow to a stop and respond quickly to his lights? Did you pull safely to the right? Did you use your blinkers (turn signal)? Did you pull to a safe location? Did you park parallel to the pavement?
Did you strike or hit the curb? Did you place the car in park? Did you turn off the car?

2. The trooper is going to be able to see inside the car completely. They will be looking at all of your physical movements inside the car. 

Did you turn off the car? Did you remove your seatbelt? Were you able to open the glove box and take out a registration/insurance? Were you able to retrieve your license from your wallet? Did you put down the window?

Did you fumble? Did you struggle to open the glove box? Did you fail or forget to get your license out of your wallet? Did you give them a credit card and not a license?

Alcohol affects physical coordination and fine motor movements. People who are impaired or intoxicated have difficulty with even simple tasks.

3. Every trooper command, direction, and instruction is a mini-test.

Did you follow the instructions? Did you appear to understand all his/her directions? Were your responses to these commands appropriate?

Did you stare at them blankly after they asked you a question? Were you slow to respond to their commands?

Alcohol affects mental function and cognition. People who are under the influence may not be alert and aware of their surroundings. They may be slow or lack the ability to follow even simple directions.

4. Your exit of the car will be observed closely.

Did you trip, stumble, or fall? Did you use the car's door frame to balance? Did you need to hold on to the car after your exit? Did you remember to take off your seat belt before exiting?

All of this occurs prior to the giving of any FSTs (Field Sobriety Tests). That is why THE STOP of the car must be scrutinized. The defense of a DWI case must look at ALL aspects of your contact with law enforcement not just the ones that they (the police) may selectively highlight.

Lawrence (Larry) Newman, D.C., J.D.

Doctor of Chiropractic
Attorney and Counselor at Law

Ithaca, NY
newman.lawrence@gmail.com

607-229-5184

http://www.ithacadwi.com



Bài đăng phổ biến