FRIDAY, MARCH 16, 2012
LETTER LEFT BY SUNNY SHEU IN MAILBOX OF JUDGE GOLIA
LINK
Some have suggested that the letter Sunny Sheu admitted to have left in the mailbox of Judge Golia may have been of a threatening nature, and that the judge then had a legitimate right to have Sunny detained and questioned.
In fact, if the letter had been perceived to be threatening, the sole Constitutional remedy would have been for Judge Golia to request a temporary restraining order against Mr. Shue, which would be binding until the matter was adjudicated by another independent judge.
If the TRO were upheld by the independent judge, Mr, Sheu could have been ordered to stay away from Golia's property or person.
That is the SOLE Constitutional procedure for citizens, for mayors, for presidents and for judges.
The Constitution does not allow for unwarranted detention and interrogation of citizens or residents.
The forcible and warrantless abduction of Sunny Sheu by NYPD detectives of the Queens DA Bureau is a case of Kidnapping in the Second degree, as defined by the NY Penal Code
Regardless of the above, the letter left by Sunny Sheu in the mail box was thoroughly innocuous, and cannot be perceived as threatening in any way:
Here is the letter in its entirety, in Sunny Sheu's original format and wording:
In fact, if the letter had been perceived to be threatening, the sole Constitutional remedy would have been for Judge Golia to request a temporary restraining order against Mr. Shue, which would be binding until the matter was adjudicated by another independent judge.
If the TRO were upheld by the independent judge, Mr, Sheu could have been ordered to stay away from Golia's property or person.
That is the SOLE Constitutional procedure for citizens, for mayors, for presidents and for judges.
The Constitution does not allow for unwarranted detention and interrogation of citizens or residents.
The forcible and warrantless abduction of Sunny Sheu by NYPD detectives of the Queens DA Bureau is a case of Kidnapping in the Second degree, as defined by the NY Penal Code
Regardless of the above, the letter left by Sunny Sheu in the mail box was thoroughly innocuous, and cannot be perceived as threatening in any way:
Here is the letter in its entirety, in Sunny Sheu's original format and wording:
___________________________________________________________________
Hon Joseph Golia
New York State Supreme Court 1/6/2009
Index: 31307/2001
It’s over 8 years,we have been prohibited to have any NY CPLR most basic “due process”…to discovery, to deposition, to subpoena to counter claim, to cross claim again and again and our 3rd party summon has been ignore ,too.
After contacted NYPD,Commissioner Mr. Raymond W. Kelly ,Lut. Comofrty in 109 agreed that Det Keith Ng and Det.Kin Lee who investigation the crime should testify to you about the bank’s officer and closing lawyer violated law and the bank’s closing lawyer internationally accepted fake deposit of Residential contract of sales,fake money order,fake check, falsify bank records to endorsed the fraudulent mortgage and got some money for himself.
There are no reasons you free all the criminals $0 dollars of judgment at all.
Would you mind to schedule a hearing as soon as possible?
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét