Wait, what? Another war on [your politically popular cause here]? I can't keep track of them all. This one, however, is unintentional. We backed into it by accident, La Brea Tar Pit style, while our sensibilities were addled by that Demon Weed. And not just pot, all manner of "harder" drugs too. Turns out you don't actually have to ingest the stuff for it to alter the capacity for rational thought.
You see, wars cost money (and lives and community resources generally). And the money (and lives and resources) committed to a war can't be used for other stuff. So, in a world of finite resources, the question boils down to: what matters most? What do you care about? What will you give up other stuff to have? In answer to that question, in 1971, that social visionary Richard M. Nixon, launched the War on Drugs. And ever since, the government has shoveled money, lives, and resources into that furnace at an ever-increasing pace, in the service of making certain that our neighbors don't alter their consciousness by non-government sanctioned means. The fallacy of the underlying premise - that government can control citizens' conduct by force and intimidation - works for some of the people some of the time but most of the people almost not at all. History offers not a single example of successful prohibition, and it appears increasingly unlikely that this latest incarnation will be the first.
But it can't be a bad thing to try, right? We have to try, don't we? Do we? I mean, what can it hurt? Lots. Welcome to the law of unintended consequences or, to use a currently-popular military phrase, collateral damage. In the throes of reefer madness we've lost sight of what that particular madness costs, and who is paying the price. In our laser-like focus on where the resources are going, we've lost sight of where they're coming from. Hence, the unintentional War on Education (and lots of other stuff too).
This graphic, No Justice For All, from Onlinecriminaljusticedegree.com offers a cocktail party simple illustration of the crushing societal burden of the War on Drugs, who is benefiting from it, and who is not. Which would be one thing if it worked. It's a high price to pay for abject failure. So, what do you care about?
Referrals to New York State attorneys. The Lawyer Referral and Information Service is a public service of the New York State Bar Association that provides ...
Đăng ký:
Đăng Nhận xét (Atom)
Bài đăng phổ biến
-
Provisions in Settlement Agreement Which Govern Award of Attorney's Fees, Rather than Statutory Provisions, Control. In Berns v Halberst...
-
The Cultural Property Advisory Committee will be holding public sessions on October 12 and October 14, 2010 to consider renewing the cultura...
-
For what its worth, the BG&S website has some articles I've authored, each of which should have been published by now in "The S...
-
The need to renew previously made requests has been in the news recently with lots of reminders that if you don't a request to be on the...
-
I have just turned the magic age of 48. Getting a bit more grey, having a few more excuse me "sirs" thrown my way pauses me to th...
-
In People v Helmer ( 2009 NY Slip Op 04830 4th Dept 6/12/09) the sole issue was whether the victim was a stranger to defendant for purpose...
-
I'm living my dream. When I told my friends five years ago where I was moving they recommended I see a therapist. I escaped the big city...
-
Judge Nelson Roman, Deputy Mayor Carol Robles-Roman, Is Approved For Seat in Southern District CourtSenate Committee Approves Roman for Southern District By Mike Paquette New York Law Journal March 4, 2013 LINK Cover Story: Hispanic Power ...
-
Let us thank the American Bar Association for giving the green light late last year to allow the corporations and corrupt TARP receiving ban...
-
re-posted from Parentadvocates.org LINK The subtitle of the article on the July 29, 2012 New York Post: "Judges' pals cashing in...
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét