New York is a Nebulous State or Why Our Traffic Tickets Tell You Nada

One of the questions I have to frequently answer as an Upstate Attorney is:

Why is that New York traffic tickets (UTTs/Uniform Traffic Tickets) don't tell you how to pay?

They don't tell you what to pay? Basically (the tickets) give very little in the way of direction on what to do next. Only check off a box, guilty or not guilty? do you want a supporting deposition? What if I plead guilty? then what? Questions only lead to more questions.

Who do I pay? Where do I pay? Maybe even, can I just pay this? People (let's call them violators) just want to be done, they just want to put it behind them.

I guess in comparison with Pennsylvania, New Jersey, or even Florida where the tickets have very specific itemized amounts to pay in fines and/or clear cut options (traffic school/diversion) our tickets are antiquated. Much like our system of little village, town, and city courts with night hours, afternoon hours, and non-lawyer judges New York tickets are caught in a time warp.

Bottom Line: You don't know from looking at the ticket, what it will cost or how many points will be assessed. Try calling the Court looking for answers and you may be in for another surprise, these are mostly part-time courts with part-time staff (clerks) and they are rarely there. Some have machines (answering machines) where you cannot leave a message. Some have office hours two or three hours a week. As in please call back between the hours of 10 and 12 on the third Tuesday. I kid you not.

More important things to know:

FIRST: New York courts have wide ranges of punishments for most offenses, including traffic violations.

Ticket fines can range from $ 0 to hundreds of dollars. It is completely in the Judge's discretionary powers.

SECOND: New York courts will potentially assess: points for each ticket, fines for each ticket, a NYS surcharge per ticket, and maybe even a three year NYS DMV surcharge per the points.

THIRD: Even if you get a plea bargain (plea offer) from a District Attorney's office the Judge can choose to accept or reject it entirely or in part. Again this is in their discretion as Justices.

 Caveat Violator in treading these waters. You can always do it alone or you can hire a seasoned navigator familiar with these changing seas. The choice is always yours.

Lawrence (Larry) Newman

Doctor of Chiropractic
Attorney and Counselor at Law

Practice focused on traffic, DWI, and criminal defense within the Finger Lakes area of NYS.

607-229-5184
newman.lawrence@gmail.com

http://www.ithacadwi.com

Caveat Emptor, Quid Pro Quo, and the Dangers of Dis-counted Professional Services

In any given day I am on phone more than I am off the phone. Whether this is a good thing or not I can't really say. Should I be concerned about cell phone radiation? Or should I be more concerned about global warming or my neighbor's desire to frack? So many pressing questions and neurotic wanderings. Ithaca forces me to think about my impact on the planet!

Discounted Legal Services

As an Ithaca attorney that sells legal services sometimes (it is not often) people ask me for a discount. You've seen those internet ads, tickets for $195, DWI defense for $500, divorce for $399, and the list goes on and on.

Ah the dangers of dis-counted professional services.

I feel this is a huge problem because anytime you engage anyone for a service/a job to do there MUST be an equal footing. A give and take, as they say in latin, "quid pro quo."

Quid Pro Quo

Quite simply, "You give something and you get something." Trying or attempting to violate this law of nature (law of the universe) will lead to multiple problems. The Universal Law is called the Law of Reciprocity. Punishment for violating man-made law is one thing but the punishment/pain for violating Universal ones can be moreso. It is true in Every relationship you have.

First, if you give but do not receive you will feel resentment (re-sent-ment = feeling uneven). This will grow as the magnitude (the size) of the discrepancy enlarges. You know how you feel when someone takes and takes and then takes some more, in Yiddish (my Jewish roots) we call this person a Schnorrer. In German, a schnorrer is a freeloader, someone that pinches you for little crap over and over. What is worse is that this person feels entitled for some reason to get without giving.

Attorneys or doctors or any other professional who gives without receiving is unlikely to want to take your call, let alone return your call, or even spend anytime with you or your problem.

Second, people feel good about their relationship with anyone when they are on an equal footing. Balanced relationships mean meeting the other party's values and goals. In our personal relationships this is not usually achieved through money. In fact, it might be easier to pay then to have to sit through another fantasy chick flick where men act and think like women, just kidding. Creating and fostering a healthy professional relationship necessitates the exchange of money for service. Bartering is usually not a viable or easy option.

Dis-Counted Services

In Spanish, DES = un when before a word, as in "not counted." This is the same as in English, DIS = un, as in services which are "NOT counted" or worse yet, "NOT valued", or NOT worth as much.

I refuse to dis-count my self, my time, my experience, or the value of what I have to offer. Basically, dis- anything means to de-value. Anyone doing this is telling you loud and clear exactly how they feel about themselves and what they have to offer the world. They feel worth-less (they are selling themselves out) than they are willing to charge. The price (label) on their sleeve is cheap. With that mindset, how they value your time, the court's time, and their own time (and service) is going to be a potential problem.

Judging a Book by It's Cover

Maybe you should not judge a book by it's cover? Maybe the unshaven, unkempt, unclean, and disheveled person you hire to work on something is really a highly competent, skilled, knowledgeable, and experienced professional? Does professionalism run skin deep? If someone does not invest in their appearance, in their continuing education, and in their personal health/well being does all that speak louder than words? First impressions may not be always be accurate but they are telling.

What you see is what you get. If by some miracle you believe in Hollywood fantasy then maybe you buy into the fact that people can be and are usually incongruent. That the bum on the street is really a prince in disguise or that the child rapist is really a loving father.

Real world 101: people generally act, look, walk, and talk with congruency. They are what they are. If they are sloppy in their personal lives than it is likely they are just as sloppy in their practice lives. If they are cheating on their wives/girlfriends what makes them now selectively honest with you? If someone has their stuff together personally then it is likely they are a pretty good gamble/ bet professionally. I have run and consulted for dozens of professional practices as both Chiropractic Physician and as an Attorney. I can state with absolute certainty that Your "Practice" life usually mirrors Your "Personal" life.

Services are More than Time

The plumber comes over the house, spends five minutes checking the pipes to the radiators, takes out his wrench, makes two twists on one pipe and charges you $80.00. In 10 minutes he checked. evaluated, and fixed your problem. Was he worth $480/hour? Yes. You did not pay him for his time, you paid him for his expertise, his experience for the past 20 years, and his knowledge. Would you rather have the 15 minute digital laser root canal or the three hour manual drill root canal? Maybe you want your money's worth lol.

What a professional knows is worth far more than their time expended. A para-legal or neophyte lawyer may be able to do the job but at what skill level is questionable. What they counsel you on or about may be vitally important. What they fail to tell you or what they forget or what they just do not know can make a difference.

Do you honestly believe that you can get the for a limited time only, super discounted legal service
AND a highly qualified, experienced, and skillful advocate? If you do I have some land to sell you in the Florida Everglades (it may be under water right now) at a special dis-count.

Having it BOTH Ways

You can't have it both ways. You can't have your cake and eat it too (what that really means I will never understand). In other words, dis-count and high value and worth don't go together.

People who are true professionals with confidence, high self worth, and self esteem
DO NOT Dis-count themselves. I know what I am worth, I honor my value to my clients and to my profession. I pledge myself to provide a service that is first rate, first class, and of integrity.

Waking up in the morning and looking in the mirror is easy if you are competent, confident, and do something very well.

Caveat Emptor

When it comes to any professional service these days, Caveat Emptor (let the buyer beware). Be aware of what you are buying. Be aware of who you are dealing. Be aware of what you are getting. And if for some reason you feel you can cheat the system (the universe) or anyone or anything else of their due
may G-d help you. For the scales will not be in your favor. The grand balance does not care about your
entitlements, your baggage, your personal gripes or anything else, it knows one thing, there will be a balance sometime and somewhere.

Lawrence (Larry) Newman, D.C., J.D.

Doctor of Chiropractic

Attorney and Counselor at Law

504 North Aurora Street

Ithaca, NY 14850

607-229-5184

http://www.ithacadwi.com

http://www.ithacainjurylawyer.com

The Ithaca Haimisher Lawyer

I have found that as much as we all move or change we can never escape who and what we are. I have lived and worked in many places. Whether as a Chiropractor or a lawyer, or practicing in NJ, NY, PA, and Florida the essential, the core, and the identifier of how I practice goes back to my roots.

The Yiddish of my childhood was more than words. It was a philosophy. It was in the modern vernacular a paradigm for living. Being true to yourself, and your family name.

I was taught at an early age that out in the world I represented more than myself. I represented the Newman family. Even my Jewish name was loosely translated, Larry "son of" Albert (my father).

My father demanded respect. It was only one little word but to him it meant more than just two small sylables. It meant respect to and for self, to and for others, to and for the community, and above all else to and for
 G-d.

My father longed that I should become in his mind a "mensch." A good human being. He led by demonstration. He would teach me to tip, to thank, to appreciate, to enjoy, to value, and most of all to be honorable. My word was to be important. My knowledge and ability to be used to assist others less fortunate. In his view this was the challenge of parenting. His children, his "kinder" were either going to be the gift or the curse he brought upon the world.
 
One of my favorite expressions was "Haimisher." I wanted not a house but a haimisher or haimishe home. One that felt soft, liveable, and smelled of good food. I was not raised with country clubs, golf, and tennis but with a corner deli and city streets.


To me a "Haimish" person is: down to earth, sincere, real, and authentic. Kinda like home cooking, apple pie, or a comfortable pair of shoes. I aspire to be the haimisher, or haimishe lawyer. One that gets knee to knee, speaks plain, and is real with people.
 
There is no BS in the haimish practice of any profession. There is no pretense. No stuffy titles, or lineage, or pedigrees. What there is a reciprocity and respect between the client/patient and the counselor.

DWI Refusal Cases Can be the Better Gamble

I just finished off three DWI refusal cases, as in got them reduced. Reductions BTW are a big deal, especially in criminal law. Many prosecutors do not like reducing charges from level to level. Getting a Felony reduced to a misdemeanor or a misdemeanor reduced to a violation is often the big win.

Now before you glorify me, G-d forbid, there are a great many cases that do not get reduced, there are many cases that I have lost. Nobody wins all their cases. Anyone who says they do is not telling you everything. I have had clients after trial who were found guilty as charged of two DWIs (the common law and the per se). It doesn't feel good, trust me.

But that said, I like the odds, the chances with the Refusal cases. Yeah, no breath, no blood, no measurement!! NO NUMBERS, NO BAC.

The unique opportunity with DWI refusal cases is the administrative refusal hearing. It allows for cross examination of the police officer concerning the legality of the stop and the arrest. It can be a great beginning to gathering the evidence (all the facts) necessary to defending the case against intoxicated driving.

The hearing is for four main areas legally:

DMV Refusal hearing:

VTL 1194 (2) (c) : the hearing is limited to the following issues:

1. did the police officer have reasonable grounds (PC) to believe that such person had been driving in violation of any subdivision of VTL 1192?

2. Did the police officer make a lawful arrest ?

3. was such person given sufficient warning, in clear and unequivocal language, prior to such refusal that such refusal to submit to such chemical test or any portion thereof, would result in the immediate suspension and subsequent revocation of such person’s license or operating privilege whether or not such person is found guilty of the charge for which the arrest was made.

4. did such person refuse to submit to such chemical test or any portion thereof?

Was the refusal persistent?

Imagine a DWI refusal case with a stop for an equipment violation, Now I'm getting really excited, Why you ask?  Now we have a DWI case with no number, no BAC, and with get this... NO DRUNK DRIVING!

Gotta love it, a Drunk case with no drunk driving and no forensic evidence to prove blood alcohol. There are other things to consider but all things being equal, I like the odds better with these cases.

Ithaca College, Criminal Charges, and Administrative Hearings

Sometimes as part of my representation of IC (Ithaca College) students they will request my attending their administrative hearings. Violations on campus and usually many of the dorms/apartments are part and parcel of campus property will often result in a separate college board hearing/review to determine what consequences/punishments/reprimands/suspensions/expulsion the student may face for their criminal charges.

Under the IC policy ANY attorney involvement in these is forbidden. This is a "one on one" meeting.

See highlighted code under (5.) below:

7.1.2.4 Administrative Hearing Process [IV]

As amended by the Ithaca College Board of Trustees April 14, 2000, October 13, 2006, and May 17, 2009.

When a nonacademic incident occurs involving an Ithaca College student's alleged violation of any rule or regulation outlined in the "Statement of Responsibilities," policies provided in section 7.1.2.3 or in the residential life rules and regulations, the matter will be handled according to the following procedures unless the incident occurs at the end of an academic year and involves a graduating senior. For an incident involving a graduating senior, the College shall be permitted to modify the steps in the hearing procedure to allow for resolution of the matter prior to commencement:

1.	The incident is documented.
2.	The documentation is then forwarded to the director of judicial affairs or other appropriate administrative hearing officer, who will determine if the student will be charged for the alleged violation(s) of the student conduct code.
3.	When a student is charged, the student will be notified in writing by the director of judicial affairs or other appropriate administrative hearing officer. This written notice will include the section(s) of the residential life rules and regulations and/or the student conduct code allegedly violated; a brief description of the incident; the date, time, and location of occurrence, if available; and an appointed time to meet with the designated hearing officer. The letter will include instructions for rescheduling the meeting should the student have a conflict with the scheduled time. The letter will include a statement indicating that if the student fails to appear for the meeting, that student waives the student's right to this administrative hearing process and a decision regarding responsibility and sanction will be assessed based on the available evidence. This judicial charge notice must be received by the student at least 72 hoursbefore an administrative hearing is convened to consider the matter.
4.	Students who fail to appear at the appointed time or fail to reschedule prior to the time of the original appointment waive their right to a hearing and may be assessed an appropriate sanction by the judicial hearing officer if responsibility is determined based on the evidence available.
5.	The administrative hearing is a one on one meeting between the student and the judicial hearing officer. The presence of an attorney and/or written materials submitted by an attorney in representation of his/her student client is prohibited. In the administrative hearing with the judicial hearing officer, the administrative procedures and charges will be explained, documentation and evidence will be reviewed, and the student will be provided the opportunity to have all pertinent questions answered. At the hearing the student and the judicial hearing officer will discuss the relevant information from the incident as well as any other information that the student or the judicial hearing officer deems appropriate.
6.	This hearing will result in one of the following possible outcomes:
	The hearing officer may dismiss the charge(s). The student may accept responsibility for the violation or may be found responsible by the hearing officer based on a preponderance of the evidence. A sanction (see section 7.1.2.8) will be verbally indicated by the hearing officer within 24 hours of the hearing, with written notification to follow within ten (10) College business days. In the event that a judicial hearing officer determines that additional information or further investigation is required in order to reach a decision, the outcome of the hearing will be delayed pending this investigation. The judicial hearing officer will follow up with the student to arrange any additional needed meeting(s) and/or to apprise the student of the investigations in progress. The process will conclude with a final decision regarding the hearing.
7.	The student who has been charged under the student conduct code may at the conclusion of the administrative hearing process choose to accept the decision/sanction or choose to have the case heard before the conduct review board. (See section 7.1.2.5.) If a case involves a graduating senior, the decision of the judicial hearing officer is final unless the decision/sanction involves withholding of a transcript or diploma, suspension, or expulsion. A decision/sanction involving withholding of a transcript or diploma, suspension, or expulsion may be appealed to the vice president for student affairs and campus life or designee.
8.	In cases of Sexual Misconduct or Domestic Violence the following additional procedures will be incorporated in the administrative hearing process: a. The primary witness and accused student will have the right to select an adviser from a specially trained pool of students, faculty and staff trained in the areas of domestic violence and sexual misconduct. The special adviser will help guide the primary witness/accused student through the judicial process., b. The administrative hearing will be conducted by both a male and female hearing officer. c. The primary witness will be given the opportunity to meet with the hearing officers to provide information about the case prior to the hearing. If a primary witness elects NOT to attend this meeting, the alternative options are handwritten, audio taped, or video- taped statements submitted 24 hours in advance of the hearing.

The student may also choose to have a conduct review board hear the student's case if the student has been charged under the residential life rules and regulations and the hearing officer has imposed a sanction of residence hall reassignment, residence hall restriction, and/or termination of the student's housing contract. No other sanctions imposed by a hearing officer regarding the residential life rules and regulations carry with them the option of a conduct review board hearing.

A written request for a conduct review board hearing must be received by the director of judicial affairs within 72 hours of the written notification of the sanction(s) from the administrative hearing.

In the event that a student is eligible to have the student's case heard before a conduct review board and chooses to do so, the decision rendered in the administrative hearing becomes null and void, and the student continues without sanction until the conduct review board hearing process is completed.

Takeaway: So I think it best to talk to an attorney before your proceeding, to discuss the impact of the criminal proceeding, and how it's outcome may be followed by resolving academic issues later on. Sometimes it also helps to let the College know you are accepting responsibility for your conduct, and being proactive about getting help. These things can go a long way to assist your long term college goals.

Mastering DWI Defense

Well as the year winds down it is a perfect time for reflection. Why do I do what I do? DWI defense: It is challenging, and my goal is mastery.

You see I have always wanted to do things very well. As a kid I loved magic, photography, and bodybuilding/powerlifting. I spent countless hours engaged in those activities. Time was never a factor. It seemed as if I got so involved that the world did not exist. My sister called me (more like labeled me) obsessive and intense. So why was I this way? What drove me?

One of my mentors (btw a good thing to have) Dr. John Demartini, said that the VOID drives the VALUE.

I have always felt less than. I have felt the need to prove myself to the world. To prove my value, my worth, and my ability. I was short, pimpled (nice way to say Acne), curly haired (not a popular thing in my day), husky (another word for fat), clumsy (uncoordinated), nerdy, and a day dreamer. Nobody thought I would amount to much. Childhood was hard for me, picked on, ridiculed, and generally tormented for being different. So I focused on being really good at whatever I chose to pursue. I wanted to show them (them being everyone/everywhere).

I built my own little photo lab in my basement, with used cameras, developing tanks, and an old enlarger. I put on magic shows, I even performed for Mayor Beame and the democratic party back in the day. I invented a magic trick that was published by Tannen's (one of the oldest magic shops in NYC) at the age of 14. Lastly, I competed in powerlifting, eventually coming in 3rd place in New York State in 1980.

I am still on my quest for mastery. I am committed to traveling whatever distance, paying whatever price, and doing what it takes in time, energy, and money to be the best I can . . . This time, at DWI defense mastery. I follow the same SUCCESS formula every time:

1. find and go to seminars, people, and events that I can learn from.

2. find and buy books, tapes, and dvds to learn from.

3. organize and spend part of everyday (or almost every day) reading/listening/writing

4. commit to mastering each part and area of the subject

5. pay the price for success, in time, money, and energy

6. accept and learn from my mistakes and rejections

7. work hard at preparing for all of my challenges.

This year I attended and participated in 10 seminars:

January 2010: Gerry Spence Trial Lawyers College: Opening Statement, Asilomar, California

February 2010: Gerry Spence Trial Lawyers College: Direct Examination, Round Top, Texas

March 2010: Gerry Spence Trial Lawyers College: Closing Argument, Leavenworth, Washington

April 2010: Texas Criminal Defense Lawyers Forensic Science for DWI New Orleans, LA

June 2010: Gerry Spence Trial Lawyers College: Psychodrama, Dubois, WY

June 2010: New York Criminal Defense Lawyers NY DWI Update, Wayne, New York

October 2010: New York State Bar Assoc. Expert Witness Seminar, Syracuse, New York

October 2010: New York Criminal Defense Lawyers DWI Update, Syracuse, New York

October 2010: The Breakthrough Experience, Self Mastery Program, Boston, Mass.

November 2010: Texas Criminal Defense Lawyers, Advanced DWI Seminar, San Antonio, Texas

7 states, 10 seminars, and one incredible year. I won't even begin to tell you the number of books, dvds, and cds I have purchased on criminal law, and DWI defense. Suffice it to say I have quite a library (my resources).

I believe "You" are always your greatest investment. A great many companies, organizations, and businesses spend millions on advertising/marketing for clients/customers.

If only they spent that time, energy, and money on their product or service. People sometimes ask me How I "Get" Clients. So many people are only interested (primarily interested to be fair) in the bottom line.

In my opinion these companies do not:

Panera's Bread, Starbucks, Dunkin Donuts, Apple, Wegman's, . . . Great bread, coffee, computers, and service . . . looking towards the future, innovating, transforming . . .

They "Focus" on being better, rendering a better product, a better service, not on a gimmick, or selling a fantasy to people.

As to me . . . Well, I not interested in retiring, why would I? I love what I do (contributing and serving as an attorney), I care about doing a great job (the best with the facts/case in front of me), I love learning, growing, and transforming my self and my business with new ideas,

so as 2010 comes to a close I look forward to re-grouping to do more (quality not cases) in 2011.

Understanding the New York DWI PSI (Pre-Sentence Investigation) Part Two

The PSI is a process that should be taken very seriously. Your honesty with the probation department is paramount. They will be checking and verifying any and all information provided. Sometimes referred to as "collaterals," as in collateral sources of information, the contact phone numbers and references you provide to the officer must corroborate with your statements to the officer. Lying about your previous employment, drinking, and drug use will negatively affect your report. Your being accurate and truthful with the probation officer will go a long way to ensure a favorable report.

First impressions count. Showing up on time for your appointment, being clean, neat, and ready to cooperate will start your interview off on the right foot. You may be asked to go for a drug/alcohol evaluation and/or a psychiatric evaluation. In certain situations, more than one probation interview may be necessary. Also in certain situations the probation officer may feel it is important to have a one on one discussion with some of your family members prior to writing his report.

The Pre-Sentence Report contains the following sections:

1. A Cover sheet. This has the basic facts about you and the charges.

2. Prior Criminal History. Your attitude about past behavior (whether you have accepted full responsibility for your actions) and current behavior are very important. If you have pled guilty now is NOT the time to downplay your guilt or your actions. The officer will be attempting to see if you are owning up to this crime, and how you came to be in this situation.

The two most important R's are: REMORSE and RESPONSIBILITY

3. Your Social History, and current circumstances.

Stability of home life (past and present), family and friends (support), education, employment, use of drugs and/or alcohol, involvement in any treatment/rehab programs, and mental health history and counseling.

The OVERALL EVALUATION of the officer will be based upon the following:

a. Your attitude

b. Your behavioral habits, traits, and tendencies

c. Your future interests, goals, and plans

d. Your ability to cope with your past problems and your current charges

e. Your current and past associations with people (who you hang out with)

f. Your family relationships (your support system)

ARE you STABLE?

How STABLE are you?

What can probation predict in terms of your future behavior?

In other words are you a danger to yourself or others?

Do we have a cause to be concerned?

Do you require supervision?

At the end of every report is a pink sheet entitled, " Departmental Sentence Recommendation with Supporting Reasons." NOTE: This comes from the Probation Officer's supervisor, and not from the probation officer.

Your attorney can contact probation and provide information about you as well. In instances where PSIs are ordered I commonly provide the Court, the Prosecutor, and the probation officer with information concerning my clients to ensure the best outcomes.

In the end, being up front and candid with probation is the best strategy overall.

The Standardized DWI Arrest

As winter gives way to spring in lovely Ithaca I am reminded of the beauty of nature. The birds are coming back, the croci (crocuses) are beginning to emerge, and I hope we have seen the last snow of winter. It has been a mild 2010. Our friends in the big cities (Philly and NYC) got hit this year. We had hardly anything (relatively).

The wonderful thing that nature reminds me every year is that people like flowers or snowflakes are unique. Your fingerprints, DNA, and combination of traits is unlike any other the world will ever see. Yet we (as a society) like to "standardize" everything. So what gets mass produced, marketed, and sold is the average. What is played again and again is the popular song. Popular doesn't mean good, it means what the common majority likes.

So Larry, what the hell does this have to do with DWI defense? Excellent question!

Law enforcement and the government builds their case evidence (proof) using:

1. Standardized administration procedures (in both the SFSTs and Breath test)

2. Standardized clues

3. Standardized testing criteria

A DWI arrest is usually based upon the officer giving you tests at roadside. His observations, and your performance will support his decision to arrest. He feels he has probable cause (based upon his proof) to make an arrest for driving while intoxicated.

The SFSTs (Standardized Field Sobriety Tests) are:

1. A series of three evaluations that have to be administered in a standardized manner by law enforcement. They are the walk and turn, one leg stand, and HGN (horizontal gaze nystagmus).

2. They have been created/chosen/selected and established by Government Authority (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration) as a RULE.

3. This RULE is for measuring the loss of mental and physical faculties (impaired function).

But are they accurate? In other words, do they conform exactly to truth or a standard?

And are they precise? Do they strictly conform to a set pattern, standard, or convention?

The first problem with any testing following a car stop is the officer has NO BASELINE.

He or she doesn't know YOUR normal. He doesn't know your physical and/or mental limitations. This is where standardized tests don't account for YOUR unique characteristics. YOUR past knee, back, shoulder, hip, neck problems. YOUR inner ear infection, cold, or flu.

A second problem with testing is that it is usually done outside. The conditions are usually not ideal. Weather is one issue. How many winter DWI cases with snow, ice, and freezing wind as our backdrop? How many motorists are without coats, jackets, or proper (appropriate) attire for being outside at 1:00AM in Ithaca, NY in December? What of the road conditions? What area were you forced to use to perform these balance, coordination, and mental exercises in the dark and in the middle of the night?

A third problem with testing is that the officer does not always follow procedures or he complies haphazardly. Standardized testing must be done in a set way and by following very specific protocols (rules/guidelines). Often officers will refuse to acknowledge they even "measured" anything. They prefer the word "estimated" or "scored" because those terms have less precise connotations. Did the officer leave "all" his emergency lights on when giving the tests? Did he communicate what he wanted from you clearly?

A fourth problem with testing is footwear. In the summer and spring the issue is usually flip flops. In the winter it is usually boots. High heels are always an issue when it comes to having to walk on imaginary lines, and balance/stand on one leg.

The breath test also has protocols and guidelines. It also needs to be "administered" properly. Sometimes law enforcement doesn't follow all the rules. Adherence to the rulebook is not always forefront in their minds. Not being being strict in compliance can lead to inaccurate results.

And inaccurate results can lead to wrongful DWI convictions.

DWI "Just the facts, ma'am"

I listen to stories about drinking and driving almost every day. I need to know all the details. In my day we had a TV show called Dragnet. The show had a cop named, Joe Friday who loved to say, "All we want are the facts ma'am." I too want the facts but more importantly I want my client's version of the night. I want to understand his perceptions and viewpoint.

This allows me to piece together the timelines, the potential witnesses, behavior patterns, and the amount of alcohol consumed. Ultimately I want to have a more clear picture of the prosecution's case against my client. I also have a software program that allows me to input my client's age, sex, height, weight, and drinking information to arrive at a pretty accurate BAC (Blood Alcohol Concentration) at the time of driving. Of course it is only a BAC range, and highly dependent upon my client giving me reliable information.

One of the first things that is difficult to estimate is the potency of the drinks. What type of beer or wine was drank? What was it's alcohol concentration? How big were the cocktails or the glasses they came in? Sometimes "one" drink has really 3 or 4 shots of 80 proof liquor. Beer can be 3-5 % and wine can go up to 14 %. Bacardi 151 is 75 % alcohol!

I recently had a client who swore he only had 3. Yeah, as in 3 Long Island Iced Teas! Do you know how much alcohol is in one LI Iced tea? In a good one, there is probably at least 4 shots.

So my client had 12 drinks before he began drinking Lite beer later in the evening. I would imagine smoking a few hits off his buddy's joint didn't help matters.

Remember that proof is twice the percent of alcohol.

5 ounces of wine 24 proof 24 ÷ 2 = 12 (% alcohol) 12 ÷ 100 = 0.12 0.12 x 5 oz = 0.6 ounces ethanol

12 ounces of beer 10 proof 10 ÷ 2 = 5 (% alcohol) 5 ÷ 100 = 0.05 0.05 x 12 oz = 0.6 ounces ethanol

1 1/2 shot 80 proof 80 ÷ 2 = 40 (% alcohol) 40 ÷ 100 = 0.4 0.4 x 1.5 oz = 0.6 ounces ethanol

One drink = .6 ounces of ethanol and usually one drink will cause someone (the average person) to go up .02 to .03 BAC per drink. If you had 4 drinks in a one hour period then your BAC would be .08 to .12. Alcohol dissipates (is expelled, eliminated) at around .015 to .02 per hour. In theory you can drink one drink per hour and clear the alcohol from your body at that rate (in other words remain alcohol free), after the alcohol clears.

So you are at a bar and have two drinks over two hours, you leave the bar, your BAC should be less than .04?

But we do not know the size of the drinks, or your metabolism, how much you weigh, or what you ate? All these factors affect your elimination rate.

Breath tests are not always reliable, accurate, or valid. Often they are not administered properly. People come in all different shapes and sizes. Getting a real BAC is a beginning, and getting the facts of the case from my client takes us one step closer to defeating a DWI.

The New York DWI is a Two Headed Monster

In New York State if someone does (as in takes) the breath test, more accurately known as the "chemical" test back at the station then they will be charged with two counts of DWI.

1. DWI Common Law VTL 1192 (3): The government must prove (beyond a reasonable doubt) that you (the operator) were incapable (to a substantial extent) of operating the automobile both mentally and physically as a reasonably prudent driver. This usually is through the stop officer's (the arresting officer) testimony concerning your driving, behavior, appearance, testing, odor, etc. In other words, his "subjective" opinion.

2. DWI Per Se VTL 1192 (2) A BAC (Blood Alcohol Concentration) of .08 or higher or Aggravated DWI Per Se VTL 1192 (2) (a) A BAC of .18 or higher. The government needs to prove (beyond a reasonable doubt) that the breath test was given within 2 hours of your arrest, was properly administered, by a currently licensed BTO (Breath Test Operator), using properly mixed chemicals, with a calibrated and maintained breath machine. This of course is an indirect measurement of blood alcohol via a breath measurement.

The two most common machines are the Datamaster DMT (used by town, village, and city police depts.) and the Draeger Alcotest (used primarily by the N.Y. State Police). These machines are accepted by the Courts as approved for BAC testing.

There are various ways to attack both the DWI counts but remember that if you took the test it will need to be dealt with and can not be overlooked by your attorney. The per se count becomes the primary target because it is a number that the prosecution will mention again and again.

I believe that a shotgun approach to arguing that all breath testing is inaccurate and unreliable (fraught with error) will usually fall on deaf ears. A focused and detailed strategy is the most effective way to defeat each count.

Depending upon the specific facts of each DWI case arguments can be waged against:

1. Whether the procedures and protocol of breath testing were adhered to?

2. Whether the machines were calibrated in a timely manner?

3. Whether the machine in question had any recent repairs or issues?

4. Whether the chemicals were properly mixed and/or expired (out of date)?

So records need to be examined carefully and potentially subpoenas must be issued against the police to get ALL the machine records. To get police records your attorney is going to need to get Judicial Subpoenas (issued and approved through a Judge). With a lot of work often the ugly truth comes out, and the breath test's validity becomes an issue of doubt.

In recent cases, I found that the State Police had written in the wrong chemical expiration date. The chemicals were expired days before my client's breath test. After I filed my motions the Judge was compelled to throw out the test, and the prosecution's case along with it. In another case the machine had frequent break downs, and parts replaced concerning the same issue, the machine would not accept a breath sample. My client was charged with a refusal because the police said she wasn't trying (blowing) hard enough. That case was also thrown out after I subpoenaed all the machine records, and brought to light the machine's problems.

Nothing of any value is easy, cheap, or speedy. That first case went to multiple hearings and motions. My client was relieved when the nightmare was over but during the process had many uneasy days and nights. To me the DWI is a two headed monster with one head uglier than the other.

Defeating A DWI

I love to surf, the internet that is. Just yesterday I punched in the above terms "defeating a dwi" and what pops up number one but an article by me. At first I was excited, a google number one, then my expression changed as I saw that my name was left off, and admin was put on as the author.

This was a website for a chemical that eliminates odor from your breath. It was being marketed to drinkers who wish to avoid detection as in if you are ever stopped for a traffic infraction just a quick spray and the cops will go away. As I delved further I found more articles sans name. My anger at this internet piracy grew. The articles mentioned the death of my father the day after my 17th birthday, the name of one of my friends, and other personal information. Everything was there except credit to moi! I'm just a little Upstate New York DWI defense lawyer but I do have feelings. Ithaca inspires me to write and share so it is with joy that I create but give a guy credit.

Their site and my articles sans my name and info.

www.sobriety-checkpoint.net

http://www.sobriety-checkpoint.net/category/dwi-sobriety-checkpoints/

http://www.sobriety-checkpoint.net/tag/case/

My original articles:

http://www.articlesbase.com/criminal-articles/defeating-the-new-york-dwi-refusal-case-1330173.html

http://www.articlesbase.com/criminal-articles/the-power-of-words-in-dwi-case-1335602.html

http://www.articlesbase.com/criminal-articles/what-do-sex-and-intoxication-have-in-common-1330200.html

http://www.articlesbase.com/criminal-articles/defeating-a-new-york-dwi-by-beginning-with-the-end-in-mind-1335399.html

So on that note I wish to highlight the power of "honesty" in defeating a DWI. Some may think me mad in advocating for truthfulness and openness with a criminal case but I have found that not trying to cover up your fears is a better philosophy and strategy for long term success.

Jurors are not stupid. They have the same doubts and concerns as the lawyer looking at the case. If you do not allay their questions openly they will most assuredly be discussing them back in the Jury room.

We as DWI defense lawyers can not look to sweep dirt under rugs and pray that it is never discovered. Everything can be seen from different perspectives. The key with good advocacy is to put yourself in everyone's shoes. Put yourself in the shoes of the juror, put yourself in the shoes of the cop, put yourself in the shoes of the prosecutor, and put your self in the shoes of the judge. Now the case can be seen as a total whole and not a bunch of random pieces or events.

The facts of any DWI case are nothing without context. Someone has to have a viewpoint of that fact.

This is from an actual case. Fact, a driver was pulled over for having headlights that were too bright. The officer in his report made no mention of investigating or asking about the headlights. The motorist only traffic violation was the headlights but no detail or documentation of this fact, just a single ticket plus of course the DWI investigation and subsequent criminal charges.

I demanded a suppression hearing on the stop (was there reasonable suspicion), and the arrest (was there probable cause). My plan of attack was a whole line of questioning, first on the importance of the report and it's detail, then on the fact that my client showed him the dashboard, demonstrated the lights on and lights off controls. The "stop officer" had one goal for this stop (investigate the bright lights) and this sole purpose was never addressed by his investigation/inquiry.

All the DWI criminal charges were dropped. This was with a .15BAC. The outcome was a DWAI (traffic violation) pre-trial. My thoughts for this case were always that jurors would want to know, the judge would want to know THE BIG WHY? If you say the stop was for x why are you not checking x, asking about x, and investigating x?

I was able to listen to my client and get "the story" of this DWI case. His story included the lights where the officer's did not.

btw that Company in California that "borrowed" my content without giving me credit:

Pure One International

3400 West Warner Ave., Unit A

Santa Ana, CA 92704

714-641-1430

fax 714-641-1432

Bytes for All (Website creation/hosting) from someplace overseas.

I really do believe what comes around goes around so God bless them and may they reap the fruits of the seeds they sow.

Lawrence Newman, Esquire

607-229-5184

Ithaca, NY

Don't Worry Bout It!

Oh the problem of these four little words. When I hear them I cringe. I have heard these words all too often in Court. They are usually spoken by some lawyer to their client. As in, "don't worry about ... your legal status (non-citizen), your out of state license privileges, your future ability to find employment, your ability to get a professional license, your ability to travel to Canada, etc. etc.

You have to anticipate Collateral Consequences of anything. Everything (every decision) has far reaching and typically long lasting affects. Much like the game of dominoes, once we set a course of events into action, many fall one against the other, and often we cannot even predict when this chain of action will end.

So that said,

1. You have to talk to more than one lawyer about your problem. Get some different perspectives.

2. It is best to talk to a lawyer who specializes in the specific type of problem you are facing.

3. Just because someone has 20, 30, or 40 years of experience does not make him better.

4. Lawyers that use the phrase, "Don't Worry Bout It" should be avoided like the plague.

5. A DWI conviction can affect multiple life areas including your out of state driver's license, your professional licensure, your employability, your permanent record, your ability to travel freely, and your insurance rates and insurability.

As an example of this, I recently had a college student come to me with a first time DWI charge. He held a driver's license from another state. He was attending college in New York State. Since he was planning on staying here for a number of years (establishing residency) for college he should have switched over his license to New York State.

Now he faced a crossroads. Should he switch his license before his initial appearance? Should he get a New York State license? Some lawyers told him, "Don't worry bout it," I told him if I represented him I would investigate the potential DWI conviction ramifications back in his home state. I am a member of the National College of DUI Defense, and have DWI defense friends (on my list serve) as an invaluable resource of information.

The range of consequences in these situations is immense. From fines of $3,000 (ie. New Jersey) to license revocations of 210 days (ie. New Jersey) without conditional (any) driving privileges. So these decisions (much like choosing a lawyer) should not be made or taken lightly. What happens in Colorado, Mass., PA, and the other 43 states varies. But making educated and informed decisions by knowing what happens and saying "don't worry bout it" are two totally different things.

Defense is an Offensive Game

January in Ithaca, NY can be brutally cold. This season though has been mild so far. It is funny to think that 30s and low 40s can feel downright warm but compared to sub zero days... it is!

A few weeks ago I was waiting for my wife's car to be serviced at a Syracuse dealership. In the reception area I struck up a conversation about Ithaca with another customer, and that lead to the "so what do you do?" question. When I said, "I am a DWI defense lawyer" eyes were raised from magazines, and off the TV set directly to me. One woman then proceeded to tell me about her brain damaged son and the drunk driver that hurt him. I thought, oh boy! here it comes. She asked me how I lived with myself? My practicing criminal defense and especially DWI defense OFFENDED her. She said, "Those" people don't deserve to be defended. She asked me why didn't I practice public interest law? Was I only interested in making money? She then launched into a personal attack without even knowing me. I did not sit complacent, I explained my role, my passion for justice, my belief in the Constitution, and my respect for the process. I did not apologize for what I do. I am proud to defend the accused. I told her I did condone reckless or irresponsible behavior ie. I am not "for" driving drunk. That would be ridiculous.

Often in the world of law, and attorneys it is best to conduct oneself civilly. I think there is a DWI defense exemption to this general rule. I believe that is why it takes a certain personality to do this type of work well. I am at core a street lawyer. I was born and raised in the gutters of Brooklyn, so to speak. There is nothing Ivy league about me. I am not very cultured. My wife is still teaching me proper etiquette. I am a little rough. Her lifetime project is to civilize me. Yet when it comes time for confrontation guess who she calls? I am her knight. I have no issues with

going face to face or head to head over things I believe in. I am small of stature but my passion for fair, and my heart for justice are large. I hate bullies. At times I think life requires confrontation, and although the large majority of the population does not like controversy, it is necessary. Nothing of value is ever won without a fight. That is so important I want to state it again, Nothing of value is ever won without a fight! The sweetness of victory is directly proportional to the price paid to earn it.

SO some lawyers should not be defense lawyers ... If they want to be liked, if they want to be accepted, if they want to be noble, then they should be another type of lawyer. Defense to most people does not usually imply attacking an opponent but evidence must be attacked. It must be questioned! It must be challenged!

Attack an invalid stop!

Attack an invalid arrest!

Attack the police investigation!

Attack the police observations of driving!

Attack the police observations from personal contact!

Attack the field sobriety tests!

Attack breath testing instruments and their results!

Attack the administration of the tests!

Attack the officer's finding of impairment and/or intoxication!

Yes, that is why I believe that DWI defense is an offensive game.

Out of State Licenses and NYS DWI

As is often the case with students attending Cornell University, Ithaca College, or SUNY Binghamton I have clients with driver's licenses from many different states, and sometimes even different countries. With criminal charges pending, often a DWI, wasting time by waiting for things to improve on their own accord is futile.

There are unique and collateral issues that need to be dealt with early in the majority of situations. For instance, if someone is from New Jersey and holds a NJ license, and now is a student residing in New York State, and if their future plans include staying in NYS for a number of years then why are they maintaining a NJ driver's license? Is it in there best interests, financially and functionally to maintain their NJ driver's license? These issues may not be as pressing until I tell them that because they hold a NJ driver's license their NYS DWI conviction is going to cost them $1000/year for three years ($3,000 in total) in NJ, and then another $250/year for three years in NYS. In addition, NJ will suspend their driving privileges for 210 days (with NO conditional or restricted license privileges).

So waiting to hire a lawyer is not a good idea. In fact hiring a lawyer not conversant in how a DWI/DUI conviction can impact your state's driving privileges is a bad idea.

Any lawyer can do any type of legal matter. BUT will they do a good job is another story. Will they be thorough? Will they understand the collateral consequences? Just today I got an email:

"First and foremost, I'd like to say that ive gotten more information from you on your website than i did from my own lawyer! My question is...."

So my advice:

Always Hire the best Bankruptcy lawyer for your bankruptcy!

Always Hire the best family lawyer for your divorce!

Always Hire the best estate lawyer for your will and trust!

Always Hire the best business lawyer for your incorporation!

Always Hire the best real estate lawyer for your house closing or sale!

Having a generalist lawyer handle your case "may be" like having your family doctor (GP) handle a foot problem (instead of a podiatrist) or

handle a back problem (instead of a Chiropractor or an orthopedic surgeon) or

handle a skin problem (instead of a dermatologist) or

handle a psychological problem (instead of a psychologist)

Don't tell me but he's been practicing for 25, 30, or 35 years so he knows what he's doing. Remember the world is dynamic. The laws are constantly changing, the days of the generalist are over, and staying current and focused is the best strategy for long term success!

The Art of DWI Defense

As the year 2009 comes to an end for me it is a time to reflect upon the past, and prepare for 2010. I have learned a lot this year, and grown as a DWI defense practitioner, and as a person. So as the year comes to a close... what have I learned? Or more true to form ... what have I been forced to remember?

1. You have to fight for what you want. Contesting a DWI comes with a price. Very little of true value, and worth comes easily. This price is not just money. It is time, it is effort, it is emotion, and it comes with making an investment in the outcome.

Whoever is first to the battle will be fresh for the fight. Sun Tzu

2. What happens outside of the Courtroom determines what happens inside the Courtroom. If a DWI trial is a day or two, the prep for that trial is weeks to months. Much like a game of football, level of practice and training determines the game's outcome. Few realize that those magic moments on game day are the result of thousands of hours of mental and physical work.

For me it is all those seminars, certifications in FSTs and Breath Testing, books, and DVDs. It is honing and focusing on one thing to the exclusion of all else.

The general who wins the battle makes many calculations in his temple before the battle is fought. The general who loses makes but few calculations beforehand. Sun Tzu

3. DWI Policies are not set in stone. This year the Pope changed midnight mass to 10:00PM. In the 1960s the Catholic Church changed services from Latin to English. What is true and fixed one minute or moment in time will change tomorrow. Everything is dynamic, nothing is static.

If a District Attorney says, "we have never done it that way," I say, "well maybe now is the time to change." The government has policies, the Church has policies, and many corporations have policies. Rules, written and unwritten, observed and not observed are all subject to change. This year I have shown multiple people that just because you say (or your company states) this is the way it is, or this is the way it has to be, or this is the way we have done it for years, does not mean that is the way it will be, right now in this particular case or situation.

Water shapes its course according to the nature of the ground over which it flows; so in wartime there are no constant conditions. Sun Tzu

4. You have to move to progress. I get calls all the time. Sometimes from people not happy with their current lawyers. Often those lawyers did not file any motions, and did not move cases to suppression hearings in advance of trial. Even though we are in the defense game, you have to play offense as well. DWI cases are special in that waiting and hoping for what I call a Rambo victory by attrition is not a likely scenario. Remember in movie First Blood when Rambo was able to survive out in the wilderness. He was able to withstand the elements (the weather), able to forage and find food, and to create shelter out of garbage. He was able to outlast and outplay his pursuers. In survivor terms it was a battle for victory by attrition.

I have seen and heard of defense lawyers prolonging DWI cases for years in the hopes of getting a deal. Just one conference after another. This is more common with older lawyers. It is a civil strategy as well. The "Wear the Bastards Down" technique. Maybe that game plan will work with a drug case, or maybe that will work with a case involving civilian witnesses to a crime. I do not subscribe to that theory. Move, move hard, move fast, be proactive, and strike points. In other words, build a case defense, have a strategy, and attack the evidence. You cannot attack anything on your back. Make a Full frontal assault at the State's case, put them on the defense.

There has never been a protracted war from which a country has benefited.

One defends when his strength is inadequate, he attacks when it is abundant.

Thus, though we have heard of stupid haste in war, cleverness has never been seen associated with long delays. Sun Tzu

Dividing and Conquering the DWI

I am a fan of military movies. When I was young I loved to watch John Wayne, Clint Eastwood, and Charles Bronson. They were in my mind men's men. They were walking, talking confident leaders. In my memory, forever type cast as strong, wise, and tough conquerers. They fought for justice, freedom, and the pursuit of happiness.

When I think of my own career arcs, I have always fought or placed myself up against the establishment. When I was a Chiropractor, it was giving my patients the choice of using holistic and natural treatments rather than blindly following one size fits all modern-scientific medical dogma. At other times it was arguing with an insurance company who refused to pay for a procedure or denied benefits. As a lawyer practicing civil law, it was fighting hospitals, medical doctors, and their insurance companies.

Today, practicing DWI defense law, it is the New York State government, law enforcement, and their lawyers (the prosecutors). I am the check to the system. Often I work to set an imbalance. In other words, to create a more level playing field.

One basic premise behind DWI defense is that a case can be won if it is carefully and completely broken down into little pieces. The military theory behind it is called, "Defeat in Detail." You can defeat an enemy more easily by dividing their forces. As Lincoln said, "United we stand, divided we fall." Sun Tzu, said in classic military text, The Art of War, "Fracture the whole."

Any case becomes a story. Every story has chapters. Each chapter has a goal and a purpose. The story is usually of a person at the center of a police investigation.

While they (the government lawyers) are focusing on patterns and signs that focus on drunkenness. I break down the story into the good driving, normal walking, normal talking, normal thinking, normal responding, normal answering, and normal behavior into little bites of tailored information. Each chapter of my story highlights function, and normality. My story focuses on the missing pieces. Their stories embody red, bloodshot, watery eyes, slurred speech, and the strong odor of alcohol. Painting a picture of the fall down drunk. I am looking for all the other reasons (the reasonable doubt) for those same observations.

What is observed are always surface signs. Eyes can look watery at 1:30AM for many reasons, none having to do with the consumption of alcohol. The majority of people are not at their best in the middle of night, and the early morning hours.

So many questions need to be asked. How long have they been studying? How many hours sleep have you had the night before? What is the state of their health? What effect do red and blue flashing lights play in your performance? Or a huge flashlight thrust in your face? Were you nervous, upset, and scared? The term "performance anxiety" ring a bell. How well would anyone do at anything if they forced, under the gun so to speak to perform?

It's all how you look at it. It's the focus. It's the breakdown. It's the details. Make a list right now (while it is still fresh) of everything you did that was good, that was right, that was normal

on the night of your arrest. You will be surprised at how much of what you remember was normal.

New York Passes New Tougher DWI Laws

Yesterday I was first up in Ithaca City Court (first come first served), with four DWI cases in various stages of disposition. Judge Rossiter began the morning by announcing to a full Courtroom (240 cases on her docket) about the new New York DWI legislation that was a coming.

On November 18, 2009, Governor Paterson signed into law, Governor's Program Bill Number 204, The Child Passenger Protection Act, also known as Leandra's Law, it passed by the wide margin of 58-0.

New York State now joins 35 other states that make it a class E felony for first time DWI offenders driving with children as passengers. Class E Felonies carry State prison terms of 1 to 4 years, and 5 years of probation.

This new law also makes Ignition Interlock Devices Mandatory for first time DWI offenders. This is something the Court must impose for a period of at least 6 months. Illinois just put this into their law in 2009, and many other states are following suit.

Specifically under the new law:

1. First time DWI offenders (the per se violation of a BAC .08 or higher and/or common law DWI) or Impaired by drugs (DWAI drugs) driving with a child (15 years or under) may be charged with a Class E Felony. In the past, DWIs were only charged as Class E felonies after a second DWI was committed within a 10 year time period.

2. Mandatory Driver License Suspension (pending prosecution) for people so charged. This is no different than the law in it's current form.

3. Courts MUST order an ignition interlock device on all those convicted of DWI. There is a minimum 6 month time period for Installation and maintenance of the device on any vehicle owned and operated by those convicted of DWI.

4. The Probation Department within each respective county will monitor, issue regulations, and oversee these Ignition Interlock Devices, and their usage. Reading between the lines that means Probation Supervision is a likely possibility ( 3 years for a misdemeanor DWI, and 5 years for a felony DWI) for those convicted as well.

5. Drivers who cause serious physical injury (the threshold for serious injury is not very high) to children 16 or younger will be charged with a Class C Felony, punishable by up to 15 years in State Prison.

6. Drivers who cause the death of child may be charged with a Class B Felony, punishable by up to 25 years in State Prison.

7. Drivers (who are also parent, guardian, or legally responsible for a child) charged with any DWI or DWAI drugs while "that" child is a passenger will also be reported to the Statewide Central Register of Child Abuse and Maltreatment. Child endangerment charges are another likely scenario as well as being held as an unfit parent or legal guardian.

The good news, this year I have not had any DWI cases where my clients had children 16 years or younger as passengers in their cars. Although I did refer a DWI case with a NY driver traveling through another state who did have his children asleep in the back seat of his car. If that same case played out here, with this new legislation in place, it would be a potential nightmare on so many levels.

In that situation, the Office of Children and Family Services would be involved, and those parents would be facing criminal court and family court, and an open Pandora's box of problems. Charges of Child maltreatment, Child neglect, and Child abuse may add to all the other issues facing first time DWI offenders.

Lawrence Newman, D.C., Esq.

http://www.ithacadwi.com

What does Your DWI Lawyer Believe?

I have just turned the magic age of 48. Getting a bit more grey, having a few more excuse me "sirs" thrown my way pauses me to think, to reflect, and to question.

I feel extremely fortunate for my time here, my practice, and my opportunities. I have had 23 years of practicing both as a Chiropractic Physician, and as an Attorney at Law. Along the way I have had the pleasure and pain of helping thousands of people get through some of the worst times in their lives. I am at heart a caretaker. I am good at helping people heal. Whether with a word or a touch, it is my gift and ability.

I love to learn. What I have returned to again and again is that a person's beliefs will truly control and direct their destiny. At it's core, belief systems can be a series of convictions. Things that people are convinced about. They will fight to maintain them, and to honor their truth.

How many things do we believe in that are "true"? Only later to discover are false. They are propaganda, they are the ideas of others that we have bought into.

I caution those that pick counselors, choose leaders, and hire advisors to first find out what those people BELIEVE.

What does your doctor believe? Does he believe in the miracle of life and love? Does he believe that everything he was taught was fatal, actually is? Does he believe that the mind can affect the body? Does he believe that natural cures and remedies could work? Does he believe that everyone fits in the same box and should receive the same medicine? Does he buy into the value of rest, fresh air, and exercise? My father's doctors all smoked, and were overweight. They cautioned me about doing too much exercise. My father died of a third heart attack at the young age of 51. All his "trusted" doctors, his health advisors died early just like he did.

Now think about this for a moment, this is your doctor, and he is going to advise you, he is going to recommend treatment, he may even render a surgical opinion, how important is his belief system to the ultimate outcome of your care? It is everything! How he feels about drugs, food, surgery, and all else will color his advice to you.

Now take that understanding and perspective to the attorney that is going to represent you.

What does your DWI Defense attorney believe? Does he believe that the breath test is a very accurate, reliable, scientific, and valid measure of blood alcohol concentration? Does he believe that field sobriety tests are fair? Does he believe that the police officer's opinion, and his report are the truth?

I have met many attorneys whose belief systems are defeatist. They are sunk before they even begin. Where can you possibly go if you BUY into the prosecutor's machine result? What can you possibly argue with any heart or passion if you believe that your client is guilty as charged?

The reason why the best (I use that term with caution) DWI defense attorneys go to seminars (on the breath machines and field sobriety tests) is not only to gather knowledge BUT more importantly to topple belief systems. To challenge the reliability, accuracy, and validity of "objective" evidence. To change their minds about possible versus probable. To discover and uncover the natural and persistent doubt that goes with a great defense of the government's proof.

In my opinion the best DWI defense lawyers are SKEPTICS. They want to be shown, they are doubters, they are devil's advocates, they are in a word "difficult" and hard to convince.

What your lawyer and your doctor believe is very important to you and your future.

This is what I believe:

1. Machines are not perfect. They make mistakes. Even when they work perfectly they are subject to error. Often the people that use them use them incorrectly. Breath testing is convenient and cheap, it is not scientific, accurate, or reliable in it's current form.

2. All DWI cases must be looked at in detail, and the evidence must be gathered so that the situation can be looked at in the TOTALITY. How I feel about a case or advise a client will turn upon a full, fair, and realistic evaluation of everything.

3. Opinions are just that. A viewpoint, and a perspective, that have a bias, and that are highly subjective.

4. Lawyers need to understand what is important to their clients. My job is to guide, advise, and represent "their" interests being mindful of "their" values.

5. What people want, and what they can have may be world's apart. While lawyers can predict outcomes, we certainly cannot guarantee them. Many things are outside of our control. Judges, juries, and facts beyond change (accidents, prior convictions, chronologies, etc.) can impact final outcomes. When it comes to legal matters, You may want the cheerfulness of an optimist and hate the opinion of the pessimist, but what you really want is the advice of a realist.

Always ask your doctors, and your lawyers what they "believe" before you hire them to help you.