New York is a Nebulous State or Why Our Traffic Tickets Tell You Nada

One of the questions I have to frequently answer as an Upstate Attorney is:

Why is that New York traffic tickets (UTTs/Uniform Traffic Tickets) don't tell you how to pay?

They don't tell you what to pay? Basically (the tickets) give very little in the way of direction on what to do next. Only check off a box, guilty or not guilty? do you want a supporting deposition? What if I plead guilty? then what? Questions only lead to more questions.

Who do I pay? Where do I pay? Maybe even, can I just pay this? People (let's call them violators) just want to be done, they just want to put it behind them.

I guess in comparison with Pennsylvania, New Jersey, or even Florida where the tickets have very specific itemized amounts to pay in fines and/or clear cut options (traffic school/diversion) our tickets are antiquated. Much like our system of little village, town, and city courts with night hours, afternoon hours, and non-lawyer judges New York tickets are caught in a time warp.

Bottom Line: You don't know from looking at the ticket, what it will cost or how many points will be assessed. Try calling the Court looking for answers and you may be in for another surprise, these are mostly part-time courts with part-time staff (clerks) and they are rarely there. Some have machines (answering machines) where you cannot leave a message. Some have office hours two or three hours a week. As in please call back between the hours of 10 and 12 on the third Tuesday. I kid you not.

More important things to know:

FIRST: New York courts have wide ranges of punishments for most offenses, including traffic violations.

Ticket fines can range from $ 0 to hundreds of dollars. It is completely in the Judge's discretionary powers.

SECOND: New York courts will potentially assess: points for each ticket, fines for each ticket, a NYS surcharge per ticket, and maybe even a three year NYS DMV surcharge per the points.

THIRD: Even if you get a plea bargain (plea offer) from a District Attorney's office the Judge can choose to accept or reject it entirely or in part. Again this is in their discretion as Justices.

 Caveat Violator in treading these waters. You can always do it alone or you can hire a seasoned navigator familiar with these changing seas. The choice is always yours.

Lawrence (Larry) Newman

Doctor of Chiropractic
Attorney and Counselor at Law

Practice focused on traffic, DWI, and criminal defense within the Finger Lakes area of NYS.

607-229-5184
newman.lawrence@gmail.com

http://www.ithacadwi.com

5 Nano grams is the new .08 BAC: Marijuana and Driving While High

Ithaca Pot Lovers, Meet The Pot Map, Remember Pot is Still Illegal Federally, from rolling stone.com

Many regular marijuana users have recently applauded states like Washington and Colorado on being progressive in passing liberal pot legislation. Yay! people can now smoke people legally (at least under state law) and /or get a medical certification to smoke for health reasons.

As they say, the other shoe has now fallen, now these same pot loving states have enacted the first marijuana while driving laws. These laws have a specific (per se) amount of the drug that charges DWI/DUI for THC. Pot is the number two most used drug while driving so this was a natural progression of sorts.

5 Nano grams of THC is the new .08 BAC, Is it a lot or a little?

THC reaches high levels (100s of nano grams) in majority of users within one hour of ingestion. The THC in the blood will level off to 2-3 nano grams after another two or three hours passes. But if we have chronic substance users tested, their blood levels are chronically high. Are these chronic users affected the same as novice users? Are they too impaired to drive at these blood levels? Blood testing for specific quantities of THC and then judging impairment based strictly upon a number is fraught with issues. Alcohol and pot are just not the same.

CNN Road Tests Chronic Pot Users vs. Novice Users vs. Baked Users

In February 2013 CNN did a "Smoke and Drive" Road Test (closed course) study with a medical marijuana patient, a chronic user, and a novice user. All three performed well on the road tests, as in safely. Watch the video here to judge the results for yourself:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=dw1HavgoK9E

It was not until they got completely "baked"(their term) that road performance became dangerous. The main point being that the marijuana users could distinguish when they should not drive versus alcohol drinkers whose confidence increases with each drink. Alcohol tends to inflate one's sense of confidence and abilities. Being honest with yourself (when high) and conscious of what you can and can not or should not do is a good thing.

New York State Does Not Have a Specific Amount of THC (or any other drug)

NYS still does not have any quantified drug for DWI except .08 BAC for alcohol. Our DWAI (driving while ability impaired) Drugs is any degree of impairment, so having any amount in your blood, of any named drugs (there are 100s), and a demonstration of impairment is enough proof to convict.

Challenging these cases will rely upon the experts in toxicology, pharmacology, and pharmacokinetics. There is little to no agreement scientifically that any specific amount of a drug can determine a degree or level of impairment.

Lawrence (Larry) Newman, D.C., J.D.

Doctor of Chiropractic
Attorney and Counselor at Law

Ithaca, NY 14850
http://www.ithacadwi.com

607-229-5184

Ithaca Lawyer What are New York Graduated Sanctions?

from crimemuseum.com

New York probation departments and the Courts love to throw around fancy terms for pretty basic things. They use plenty of acronyms, like ATI (alternatives to incarceration) or PPI (pre-plea investigation) and everyone is expected to know what they are talking about. See you at the next PTC (pre-trial conference).

Always Ask if You Don't Know or Understand

Number rule when hiring an attorney, talking with an attorney, or dealing with the Court system is:
ask if you don't know, do not assume anything about anything, ask until you are clear about the subject and the answer. I ask about the things I don't know and there is plenty I don't know. I learn new stuff every day. It is smart to ask and dumb to pretend to know.

Fancy Words versus Plain English

Sometimes things sound better when we use colorful language.

Being Incarcerated = Going to jail or prison, being locked up!
Being placed on or in Probation = Being closely monitored and supervised for years!
Getting a CD = Having to meet certain conditions (do stuff) and stay out of trouble (no new arrests)

Striving for the Appropriate

So for today, the purpose of the Court, the Probation department, District Attorney, and the Judges is to gather all the information and facts about a person and a situation and to move towards an APPROPRIATE sentence of punishment.

What is appropriate sentence for the first time DWI offender with no accident and no injuries is NOT appropriate for the second offender or the one with an accident. Leniency for those who deserve it is at the base of this idea of fairness.

This idea or philosophy is called graduated sanctions. A gradual ratcheting up of harsher penalties. They are designed to hopefully teach, assist, train, and to rehabilitate a person from their criminal activity or behavior.

Graduated Sanctions = Gradually Increasing Punishments

Does the system fail some people? yes, but I have also seen people get the help they surely needed, sometimes whether they wanted it or not. Sometimes salvation is painful. It is generally not a fun process to say the least.

The Job of YOUR Attorney

Now the job of your attorney is to bring balance to this process via input. They must actively work to ensure that everyone gets what they need to recommend and to provide an appropriate sentence.

Your Job/employment history, education, family background, drug/alcohol evaluation, treatment, etc. can all help you or hurt you. They must be a filter and a focuser of information.

The Big HOW and WHAT

They can contact probation, they can give information about you, they can guide you to do the right things, and they can advocate to the Court and to the Prosecutor. Everything can potentially count for or against you, HOW it is presented is just as important as WHAT is presented.

Larry Newman, D.C., J.D.

504 North Aurora Street
Ithaca, NY 14850

newman.lawrence@gmail.com

http://www.ithacadwi.com

Ithaca Lawyer Can You Be Charged with a DWI in a Parked Car?

New York State law is not always simple or clean. It can be complicated only because we tend to "mince" words. This is especially true within the area of DWI law. Clearly we must have an agreement for what every word or term means if we are going to charge OR defend criminal charges.

NYS DWI is a criminal (misdemeanor) level offense as opposed to New Jersey where you get a civil traffic infraction. A mile over a bridge and the nature of an offense becomes crime. Life is truly unfair but those are the rules.

The BIG D in DWI 

Hint: Driving = Operation

Can the government (the DA, the prosecutor) prove the "D" in New York DWI when a car is in fact parked. Not just prove it but prove it beyond a reasonable doubt?


A critical element with any NYS DWI case is whether there was in fact the "D" as in Driving. Under NYS DWI law Driving really means "operating" and the difference between the two words (terms of art) is crucial.

For direction on this question we look to what a NYS judge will give to a jury for guidance on this issue. BTW Operate is a much broader term than drive under New York law.

The DWI NYS Jury Instruction for operation

 " A person operates a motor vehicle when that person is (found) sitting behind the wheel of that motor vehicle for the purpose of placing it in motion, AND when the motor is running, OR even if it is NOT moving when the engine (motor) is running."

Your intent (purpose) of being in the car is very important to the question of whether you are in fact operating the car (or plan to). The prosecutor must prove this INTENT beyond a reasonable doubt by the facts present.

A recent NY DWI case with a parked car, People v. Ramsey 2012 NY Slip Op 50672 decided on April 16, 2012 Supreme Court, Bronx County, the Court decided that operation (driving) was not found (no intent) based upon:

1. car parked legally,
2. car was off (ignition turned off)
3. Key in only for purposes of playing CDs (music)
4. police testimony failed to show ignition was engaged, assumed it was for music to play
5. car was never moved

The Supreme Court concluded that there was in fact no evidence of car movement or intent to move the car from the location it was parked. Defendant's right to privacy (4th amendment) was violated. Court determined that the police lacked Probable Cause, thus the Suppression of evidence of breath test and DWI case is mute.

Regarding operation of a car, See case of People v. Dalton, 176 Misc 2d 211 (2nd Dept., App Ter,. 1998). If DWI case, parked car, and ignition is NOT engaged see People v. Haddock, 2001 NY Slip Op 40138U (Nassau County).


         Lawrence (Larry) Newman, D.C., J.D.

Doctor of Chiropractic

Attorney and Counselor at Law

504 North Aurora Street

Ithaca, NY 14850

607-229-5184

http://www.ithacadwi.com

http://www.ithacainjurylawyer.com

Caveat Emptor, Quid Pro Quo, and the Dangers of Dis-counted Professional Services

In any given day I am on phone more than I am off the phone. Whether this is a good thing or not I can't really say. Should I be concerned about cell phone radiation? Or should I be more concerned about global warming or my neighbor's desire to frack? So many pressing questions and neurotic wanderings. Ithaca forces me to think about my impact on the planet!

Discounted Legal Services

As an Ithaca attorney that sells legal services sometimes (it is not often) people ask me for a discount. You've seen those internet ads, tickets for $195, DWI defense for $500, divorce for $399, and the list goes on and on.

Ah the dangers of dis-counted professional services.

I feel this is a huge problem because anytime you engage anyone for a service/a job to do there MUST be an equal footing. A give and take, as they say in latin, "quid pro quo."

Quid Pro Quo

Quite simply, "You give something and you get something." Trying or attempting to violate this law of nature (law of the universe) will lead to multiple problems. The Universal Law is called the Law of Reciprocity. Punishment for violating man-made law is one thing but the punishment/pain for violating Universal ones can be moreso. It is true in Every relationship you have.

First, if you give but do not receive you will feel resentment (re-sent-ment = feeling uneven). This will grow as the magnitude (the size) of the discrepancy enlarges. You know how you feel when someone takes and takes and then takes some more, in Yiddish (my Jewish roots) we call this person a Schnorrer. In German, a schnorrer is a freeloader, someone that pinches you for little crap over and over. What is worse is that this person feels entitled for some reason to get without giving.

Attorneys or doctors or any other professional who gives without receiving is unlikely to want to take your call, let alone return your call, or even spend anytime with you or your problem.

Second, people feel good about their relationship with anyone when they are on an equal footing. Balanced relationships mean meeting the other party's values and goals. In our personal relationships this is not usually achieved through money. In fact, it might be easier to pay then to have to sit through another fantasy chick flick where men act and think like women, just kidding. Creating and fostering a healthy professional relationship necessitates the exchange of money for service. Bartering is usually not a viable or easy option.

Dis-Counted Services

In Spanish, DES = un when before a word, as in "not counted." This is the same as in English, DIS = un, as in services which are "NOT counted" or worse yet, "NOT valued", or NOT worth as much.

I refuse to dis-count my self, my time, my experience, or the value of what I have to offer. Basically, dis- anything means to de-value. Anyone doing this is telling you loud and clear exactly how they feel about themselves and what they have to offer the world. They feel worth-less (they are selling themselves out) than they are willing to charge. The price (label) on their sleeve is cheap. With that mindset, how they value your time, the court's time, and their own time (and service) is going to be a potential problem.

Judging a Book by It's Cover

Maybe you should not judge a book by it's cover? Maybe the unshaven, unkempt, unclean, and disheveled person you hire to work on something is really a highly competent, skilled, knowledgeable, and experienced professional? Does professionalism run skin deep? If someone does not invest in their appearance, in their continuing education, and in their personal health/well being does all that speak louder than words? First impressions may not be always be accurate but they are telling.

What you see is what you get. If by some miracle you believe in Hollywood fantasy then maybe you buy into the fact that people can be and are usually incongruent. That the bum on the street is really a prince in disguise or that the child rapist is really a loving father.

Real world 101: people generally act, look, walk, and talk with congruency. They are what they are. If they are sloppy in their personal lives than it is likely they are just as sloppy in their practice lives. If they are cheating on their wives/girlfriends what makes them now selectively honest with you? If someone has their stuff together personally then it is likely they are a pretty good gamble/ bet professionally. I have run and consulted for dozens of professional practices as both Chiropractic Physician and as an Attorney. I can state with absolute certainty that Your "Practice" life usually mirrors Your "Personal" life.

Services are More than Time

The plumber comes over the house, spends five minutes checking the pipes to the radiators, takes out his wrench, makes two twists on one pipe and charges you $80.00. In 10 minutes he checked. evaluated, and fixed your problem. Was he worth $480/hour? Yes. You did not pay him for his time, you paid him for his expertise, his experience for the past 20 years, and his knowledge. Would you rather have the 15 minute digital laser root canal or the three hour manual drill root canal? Maybe you want your money's worth lol.

What a professional knows is worth far more than their time expended. A para-legal or neophyte lawyer may be able to do the job but at what skill level is questionable. What they counsel you on or about may be vitally important. What they fail to tell you or what they forget or what they just do not know can make a difference.

Do you honestly believe that you can get the for a limited time only, super discounted legal service
AND a highly qualified, experienced, and skillful advocate? If you do I have some land to sell you in the Florida Everglades (it may be under water right now) at a special dis-count.

Having it BOTH Ways

You can't have it both ways. You can't have your cake and eat it too (what that really means I will never understand). In other words, dis-count and high value and worth don't go together.

People who are true professionals with confidence, high self worth, and self esteem
DO NOT Dis-count themselves. I know what I am worth, I honor my value to my clients and to my profession. I pledge myself to provide a service that is first rate, first class, and of integrity.

Waking up in the morning and looking in the mirror is easy if you are competent, confident, and do something very well.

Caveat Emptor

When it comes to any professional service these days, Caveat Emptor (let the buyer beware). Be aware of what you are buying. Be aware of who you are dealing. Be aware of what you are getting. And if for some reason you feel you can cheat the system (the universe) or anyone or anything else of their due
may G-d help you. For the scales will not be in your favor. The grand balance does not care about your
entitlements, your baggage, your personal gripes or anything else, it knows one thing, there will be a balance sometime and somewhere.

Lawrence (Larry) Newman, D.C., J.D.

Doctor of Chiropractic

Attorney and Counselor at Law

504 North Aurora Street

Ithaca, NY 14850

607-229-5184

http://www.ithacadwi.com

http://www.ithacainjurylawyer.com

DWI Refusal Cases Can be the Better Gamble

I just finished off three DWI refusal cases, as in got them reduced. Reductions BTW are a big deal, especially in criminal law. Many prosecutors do not like reducing charges from level to level. Getting a Felony reduced to a misdemeanor or a misdemeanor reduced to a violation is often the big win.

Now before you glorify me, G-d forbid, there are a great many cases that do not get reduced, there are many cases that I have lost. Nobody wins all their cases. Anyone who says they do is not telling you everything. I have had clients after trial who were found guilty as charged of two DWIs (the common law and the per se). It doesn't feel good, trust me.

But that said, I like the odds, the chances with the Refusal cases. Yeah, no breath, no blood, no measurement!! NO NUMBERS, NO BAC.

The unique opportunity with DWI refusal cases is the administrative refusal hearing. It allows for cross examination of the police officer concerning the legality of the stop and the arrest. It can be a great beginning to gathering the evidence (all the facts) necessary to defending the case against intoxicated driving.

The hearing is for four main areas legally:

DMV Refusal hearing:

VTL 1194 (2) (c) : the hearing is limited to the following issues:

1. did the police officer have reasonable grounds (PC) to believe that such person had been driving in violation of any subdivision of VTL 1192?

2. Did the police officer make a lawful arrest ?

3. was such person given sufficient warning, in clear and unequivocal language, prior to such refusal that such refusal to submit to such chemical test or any portion thereof, would result in the immediate suspension and subsequent revocation of such person’s license or operating privilege whether or not such person is found guilty of the charge for which the arrest was made.

4. did such person refuse to submit to such chemical test or any portion thereof?

Was the refusal persistent?

Imagine a DWI refusal case with a stop for an equipment violation, Now I'm getting really excited, Why you ask?  Now we have a DWI case with no number, no BAC, and with get this... NO DRUNK DRIVING!

Gotta love it, a Drunk case with no drunk driving and no forensic evidence to prove blood alcohol. There are other things to consider but all things being equal, I like the odds better with these cases.

You Have Rights? Just Not So Much if You Are a College Violator

I practice in an area of numerous Colleges, Universities, and Schools of higher learning. Beautiful and now cold Ithaca, New York. Go 50 miles in any direction and you will hit pay dirt (lots of little private colleges).

Why do they put all these great schools so far from civilization? Is it the cheap real estate? Just saying...

Anyway, the Isolation sometimes breeds boredom. This Boredom leads to mischief which potentially leads to trouble. Trouble can be in one of two forms (there is a 3rd but I don't do relationship or mental counseling) criminal charges and/or administrative ones. Some schools like TC3 (Tompkins Community College) will suspend you (for a term) for a DWI. Some school police (campus po po) will sometimes file an administrative complaint against you rather than a criminal one.

Is this better?Is this worse? Well it's both.

1. The level of proof to demonstrate your guilt is higher on a criminal charge: Beyond a Reasonable Doubt
2. The level of proof to demonstrate your guilt is lower on a campus violation: Preponderance of the evidence (a little bit more likely than not, or 51% to 49% that it is true)

Sometimes it is better to have just a criminal charge, as in possession of marijuana. Then you get Full rights, an attorney, Court, Judge, etc. I once went in to defend my 6th grader, she was accused on putting holes in a cork board (yeah I know a cork board). There I was in front of four teachers and the principal. She was guilty until proven innocent. What BS! It was like the Salem Witch Trials. Apparently she was placing her pencil into prior holes (it was a cork board). I left them a piece of my mind and a short rendition of the constitution. They were unwilling to even consider the possibility that the teacher was mistaken.

 Anyway, criminal charges (a violation) may be better than having to deal with an expensive and emotional draining suspension from school, IMO. Add it up: Dorm, Tuition, loss/waste of time and work. This is definitely not "Priceless."

Remember, Administrative Campus Violations have their own process:

First, an administrative judicial officer hearing. "One on One."
Second, if you would like an appeal to a full hearing, in front of a board. (multiple members)

You can present evidence (witnesses, letters, etc.) at these hearings. You can speak up for yourself, and your conduct.

BTW, at these hearings: NO Lawyers, NO lawyer letters, NO lawyer coaching (at least open and obvious) are allowed.

From the IC book (they are all very similar, I just happen to have their's handy)

 The presence of an attorney and/or written materials submitted by an attorney in representation of his/her student client is prohibited.

What to do? Generally, Do not give up. Defend yourself. Gather evidence. If not of your innocence (maybe you are guilty), then of your character, then of your past success (academically, personally, etc.), teachers/professors can witness to bolster you as an individual, they can also write letters on your behalf.
Take it upon yourself to "Read" your college's rule book on these hearings, fully understand their process/their procedures, and what they allow you.

BTW This is not to be construed as legal advice, every situation is different.

I believe you still have RIGHTS! Any time and any place in the USA. If you are accused of something.

I believe you must Confront your accusers. Confront the accusations. Bring everything into the clear light of day. There is too much to lose to just give up.   

12 Good Reasons Not to Represent Yourself for a New York DWI

I love practicing law in an area filled with many colleges and universities. Ithaca, NY has Ithaca College and Cornell University and my practice focuses on DWI defense within 50 square miles of Ithaca. Over the years I have represented many students and professors who attended SUNY Binghamton, SUNY Cortland, University of Buffalo, Keuka College, TC3, New York Chiropractic College, Syracuse University, etc. The Finger Lakes region also draws people from all over the country for college events and games, recreational activities, and conferences.

In my view, higher education and drinking seem to go together like spaghetti and meatballs. Like it or not people like to drink. I enjoy drinking. There is no law against drinking and driving just driving while impaired or intoxicated. College can be stressful because thinking is the hardest work there is. Writing voluminous papers (often expounding on topics no one cares about), reading (usually very dry material), and taking exams (that play with your mind) is not always fun times.

Alcohol is the most common, legal, and socially acceptable drug we have. Some of my best college memories involved sharing a drink with my friends and fraternity brothers. After having been through many years of college between my undergraduate B.S. in Human Biology, my Chiropractic education, and then law school I have seen the use and misuse of drugs and alcohol. Mr. Mackie may say "drugs are baddd," but I do not believe that drugs or alcohol are bad. They have their place, much like everything else.

I have had a lot of very smart clients. Some with Masters degrees, and Phds in very hard subject areas. They are as a group highly intelligent, motivated, able to research, understand, and apply knowledge at a level beyond the average person.

Which brings me to my burning question of the day,

Should these People represent themselves? In other words proceed, "pro se"?

I will start out by stating a clear and unequivocal NO! and then give you my twelve reasons.

1. If you are embroiled in something personally it is impossible to remain objective. Distance gives perspective, balance, and non emotional (clear) judgment.

2. Most even very intelligent people do not understand the legal system. Even relatively simple Burdens of proof between license issues (administrative) and criminal cases are different.

3. Many Attorneys in 2010 have to specialize and focus in particular areas of law.

The attorney that understands and spends years practicing primarily divorce law will not know how to handle even a speeding ticket let alone DWI charges.

4. Different areas of the country, state, county, city have local rules and customs.

How a Judge, Court, or Prosecutor proceeds with a DWI case in one part of the state may differ greatly by how they handle it in another part of the state. A DWI in Manhattan uses a different breath machine, the Intoxilyzer 8000 versus the Datamaster and Draeger Alcotest (State Police) in Upstate New York.

5. There are usually collateral issues (ie. license) that need to be addressed.

Dealing with the DMV and ALJs (Administrative Law Judges) at DMV hearings is another potential aspect of DWI cases that is overlooked by lay people.

6. There are often pragmatic issues that need to be thought through. How is your case going to affect an out of state license? What are the potential penalties and future ramifications to your specific job or profession?

7. If your case requires hearings, motions, and a trial what then? Are you certified in Field Sobriety testing? Are you familiar with the forensic science behind Breath testing? Have you ever cross examined a police officer? Have you ever presented evidence? Have you ever picked a jury?

8. Would you know what to look for after you obtain the police reports, breath test documents, and other discovery? Have you read many of these? Do you understand police procedures and protocols? Would you be able to pick out problems with the processing of your case?

9. Would you know what was missing from police reports and other documents?

What's not there is as important as what is there. Can you read in between the lines?

10. Is it possible for you to look over one case (your own) in a vacuum and have any insight, perspective, and/or place it on the spectrum in comparison to any other cases? Do you have a firm grasp of current DWI case law? Can you pick out the legal issues and research them? Can you spot any potential defenses?

10. Seasoned attorneys even hire attorneys to represent them and their families.

What legal background or training do you possess? Have you had any prior experience representing anyone legally?

12. Do you believe that the Government prosecutor will negotiate with you fairly, in good faith, and the same way as if you were represented by an attorney?

Do you think you are on even ground when talking with the district attorney? Does he know more about your situation than you do?

It is often said that people who represent themselves have a fool for a client, don't be foolish get the best lawyer you can afford.